Fairness in bankruptcies: An experimental study

Alexander W. Cappelen, Roland Iwan Luttens, Erik Sørensen, Bertil Tungodden

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The pari passu principle of awarding claimants proportionally to their pre-insolvency claims is the most prominent principle in the law of insolvency. We report from a lab experiment designed to study whether people find this principle a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem. The experimental design generates situations where participants work and accumulate claims in firms, some of which subsequently go bankrupt. Third-party arbitrators are randomly assigned to determine how the liquidation value of the bankrupt firms should be distributed between claimants. Our main finding is that there is a striking support for the pari passu principle. We estimate a random utility model that allows for the arbitrators to differ in what they consider a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem and find that about 85% of the participants endorse the proportional rule. We also find that a nonnegligible fraction of the arbitrators follow the constrained equal losses rule, while there is almost no support in our experiment for the constrained equal awards rule or other fairness rules suggested in the normative literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2832-2841
Number of pages10
JournalManagement Science
Volume65
Issue number6
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Experimental study
Fairness
Insolvency
Bankruptcy problems
Experiment
Proportional rule
Experimental design
Random utility model
Constrained equal awards rule
Liquidation
Lab experiment

Keywords

  • Bankruptcy
  • Lab experiment
  • The claims problem

Cite this

Cappelen, Alexander W. ; Luttens, Roland Iwan ; Sørensen, Erik ; Tungodden, Bertil. / Fairness in bankruptcies : An experimental study. In: Management Science. 2019 ; Vol. 65, No. 6. pp. 2832-2841.
@article{628b444f618041e3af339a44da093e08,
title = "Fairness in bankruptcies: An experimental study",
abstract = "The pari passu principle of awarding claimants proportionally to their pre-insolvency claims is the most prominent principle in the law of insolvency. We report from a lab experiment designed to study whether people find this principle a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem. The experimental design generates situations where participants work and accumulate claims in firms, some of which subsequently go bankrupt. Third-party arbitrators are randomly assigned to determine how the liquidation value of the bankrupt firms should be distributed between claimants. Our main finding is that there is a striking support for the pari passu principle. We estimate a random utility model that allows for the arbitrators to differ in what they consider a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem and find that about 85{\%} of the participants endorse the proportional rule. We also find that a nonnegligible fraction of the arbitrators follow the constrained equal losses rule, while there is almost no support in our experiment for the constrained equal awards rule or other fairness rules suggested in the normative literature.",
keywords = "Bankruptcy, Lab experiment, The claims problem",
author = "Cappelen, {Alexander W.} and Luttens, {Roland Iwan} and Erik S{\o}rensen and Bertil Tungodden",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.2018.3029",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "2832--2841",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "6",

}

Cappelen, AW, Luttens, RI, Sørensen, E & Tungodden, B 2019, 'Fairness in bankruptcies: An experimental study' Management Science, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2832-2841. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3029

Fairness in bankruptcies : An experimental study. / Cappelen, Alexander W.; Luttens, Roland Iwan; Sørensen, Erik; Tungodden, Bertil.

In: Management Science, Vol. 65, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 2832-2841.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fairness in bankruptcies

T2 - An experimental study

AU - Cappelen, Alexander W.

AU - Luttens, Roland Iwan

AU - Sørensen, Erik

AU - Tungodden, Bertil

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - The pari passu principle of awarding claimants proportionally to their pre-insolvency claims is the most prominent principle in the law of insolvency. We report from a lab experiment designed to study whether people find this principle a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem. The experimental design generates situations where participants work and accumulate claims in firms, some of which subsequently go bankrupt. Third-party arbitrators are randomly assigned to determine how the liquidation value of the bankrupt firms should be distributed between claimants. Our main finding is that there is a striking support for the pari passu principle. We estimate a random utility model that allows for the arbitrators to differ in what they consider a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem and find that about 85% of the participants endorse the proportional rule. We also find that a nonnegligible fraction of the arbitrators follow the constrained equal losses rule, while there is almost no support in our experiment for the constrained equal awards rule or other fairness rules suggested in the normative literature.

AB - The pari passu principle of awarding claimants proportionally to their pre-insolvency claims is the most prominent principle in the law of insolvency. We report from a lab experiment designed to study whether people find this principle a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem. The experimental design generates situations where participants work and accumulate claims in firms, some of which subsequently go bankrupt. Third-party arbitrators are randomly assigned to determine how the liquidation value of the bankrupt firms should be distributed between claimants. Our main finding is that there is a striking support for the pari passu principle. We estimate a random utility model that allows for the arbitrators to differ in what they consider a fair solution to the bankruptcy problem and find that about 85% of the participants endorse the proportional rule. We also find that a nonnegligible fraction of the arbitrators follow the constrained equal losses rule, while there is almost no support in our experiment for the constrained equal awards rule or other fairness rules suggested in the normative literature.

KW - Bankruptcy

KW - Lab experiment

KW - The claims problem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066940537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066940537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3029

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3029

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 2832

EP - 2841

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 6

ER -