Abstract
The paper analyses the role of alternative far-right media in promoting and organizing mobilization against the Global Compact for Migration – the first intergovernmentally negotiated agreement, prepared under the auspices of the United Nations, covering all dimensions of international migration in a holistic and comprehensive manner. Exploring four European alternative far-right media: PI-News in Germany, Il Primato Nazionale in Italy, the UK localization of Breitbart, and the transnational Voice of Europe, we show that these media have gone beyond (dis)informing and have actively mobilized and channeled indignation through petitioning and protest organization. While most research on far-right media practices so far has focused either on social media interactions or exclusively on ‘disinformation’ and ‘fake news’, we analyse web based alternative news media as part of а far-right social movement that has successfully used progressive left-wing protests repertoires and tactics. We argue that alternative far-right news media act as ‘indignation mobilization mechanisms’ that not only fuel the indignation of the public by channeling the messages of far-right politicians but also channel bottom-up indignation through online campaigns, petitions, and offline street protests. This unabashedly biased and mobilization-oriented approach is what distinguishes far-right media from mainstream media and guarantees them a loyal and dedicated supporter base.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1333-1350 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Information Communication and Society |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 7 Jan 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Funding
I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Michael Baurmann and Prof. Dr. Ulrike Klinger for having me as a visiting researcher at The Center for Advanced Internet Studies in Bochum and The Weizenbaum Institute in Berlin. The original idea for this article came during my research stays there. Thank you also to the anonymous reviewers whose careful and constructive comments improved the article substantially.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Weizenbaum Institute in Berlin |