Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News

Celine Klemm, Tilo Hartmann, Enny Das

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk
(low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.
LanguageEnglish
Pages74-83
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Communication
Volume34
Issue number1
Early online date23 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Risk perception
Fear
Emotions
news
emotion
anxiety
vulnerability
coverage
Newspapers
Disease Outbreaks
newspaper
Disease
Experiments
experiment

Keywords

  • health
  • epidemic
  • communication
  • emotion
  • sensationalism
  • media

VU Research Profile

  • Connected World

Cite this

@article{448595862570455780e781e589b31a4f,
title = "Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News",
abstract = "This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk(low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.",
keywords = "health, epidemic, communication, emotion, sensationalism, media",
author = "Celine Klemm and Tilo Hartmann and Enny Das",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10410236.2017.1384429",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "74--83",
journal = "Health Communication",
issn = "1041-0236",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News. / Klemm, Celine; Hartmann, Tilo; Das, Enny.

In: Health Communication, Vol. 34, No. 1, 02.01.2019, p. 74-83.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News

AU - Klemm, Celine

AU - Hartmann, Tilo

AU - Das, Enny

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk(low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.

AB - This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk(low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.

KW - health

KW - epidemic

KW - communication

KW - emotion

KW - sensationalism

KW - media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031933319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031933319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10410236.2017.1384429

DO - 10.1080/10410236.2017.1384429

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 74

EP - 83

JO - Health Communication

T2 - Health Communication

JF - Health Communication

SN - 1041-0236

IS - 1

ER -