Feasibility of the Radner reading chards in low vision patients

M.C. Burggraaff, D.L. Knol, R.M.A. van Nispen, G.H.M.B. van Rens

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    141 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Being unable to read is a major problem for visually impaired patients. Since distance visual acuity (VA) does not adequately reflect reading ability, it is important to also evaluate near VA. The Radner Reading Charts (RRCs) are available to measure patients' reading performance. The present study tested the inter-chart and test-retest reliability of the RRCs in Dutch low-vision patients (i.e., visual acuity ≥0.3 logMAR) with various eye disorders. Methods: Thirty-eight patients read the three RRCs in random order. Then, about 1 month after the initial measurements, a test-retest procedure was performed in 15 of the 38 patients. Tested variables were reading acuity (logRAD), logRAD score, logRAD/logMAR ratio, maximum reading speed (MRS), and critical print size (CPS). Both MRS and CPS were calculated in two different ways. To determine the variability, a mixed-model analysis was used. Results: For all variables, the largest part of the variance was explained by the individual subject (86-89%) whereas the chart accounted for only 0-0.78% of the variability. Therefore, the inter-chart and test-retest reliability was high, except for the CPS which had a poor to moderate reliability (31-62%) when calculated in the two different ways. Conclusions: The inter-chart and test-retest results showed high reliability in patients with low vision due to various diseases; therefore, the charts are feasible to determine effects in large groups. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1631-1737
    JournalGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
    Volume248
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility of the Radner reading chards in low vision patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this