Abstract
Plant-based animal product alternatives are increasingly promoted to achieve more sustainable diets. Here, we use a global economic land use model to assess the food system-wide impacts of a global dietary shift towards these alternatives. We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental impacts by 2050 if globally 50% of the main animal products (pork, chicken, beef and milk) are substituted—net reduction of forest and natural land is almost fully halted and agriculture and land use GHG emissions decline by 31% in 2050 compared to 2020. If spared agricultural land within forest ecosystems is restored to forest, climate benefits could double, reaching 92% of the previously estimated land sector mitigation potential. Furthermore, the restored area could contribute to 13-25% of the estimated global land restoration needs under target 2 from the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework by 2030, and future declines in ecosystem integrity by 2050 would be more than halved. The distribution of these impacts varies across regions—the main impacts on agricultural input use are in China and on environmental outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa and South America. While beef replacement provides the largest impacts, substituting multiple products is synergistic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 5316 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-13 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Nature Communications |
| Volume | 14 |
| Early online date | 12 Sept 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was implemented in partnership with Impossible Foods and Limestone Analytics. This study was supported by USAID, by the European Union under grant agreement number 101060483 - SWITCH ( https://switchdiet.eu/ ), and as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from the CGIAR Trust Fund and through bilateral funding agreements. For details, please visit https://ccafs.cgiar.org/donors . The views expressed in this document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these organizations. Special thanks to Miroslav Batka for providing valuable support with data collection, analysis and modeling, Michael Wögerer, Leopold Ringwald and Ipsita Kumar for advice on the figures design and to Scott Spillias for editorial support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer Nature Limited.
Funding
This work was implemented in partnership with Impossible Foods and Limestone Analytics. This study was supported by USAID, by the European Union under grant agreement number 101060483 - SWITCH ( https://switchdiet.eu/ ), and as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from the CGIAR Trust Fund and through bilateral funding agreements. For details, please visit https://ccafs.cgiar.org/donors . The views expressed in this document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these organizations. Special thanks to Miroslav Batka for providing valuable support with data collection, analysis and modeling, Michael Wögerer, Leopold Ringwald and Ipsita Kumar for advice on the figures design and to Scott Spillias for editorial support.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| CGIAR Trust Fund | |
| United States Agency for International Development | |
| European Commission | 101060483 |
| European Commission | |
| Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver