Abstract
Feeling loved (loved, cared for, accepted, valued, understood) is inherently dyadic, yet most prior theoretical perspectives and investigations have focused on how actors feeling (un)loved shapes actors’ outcomes. Adopting a dyadic perspective, the present research tested whether the established links between actors feeling unloved and destructive (critical, hostile) behavior depended on partners’ feelings of being loved. Does feeling loved need to be mutual to reduce destructive behavior, or can partners feeling loved compensate for actors feeling unloved? In five dyadic observational studies, couples were recorded discussing conflicts, diverging preferences or relationship strengths, or interacting with their child (total N = 842 couples; 1,965 interactions). Participants reported how much they felt loved during each interaction and independent coders rated how much each person exhibited destructive behavior. Significant Actors’ × Partners’ Felt-Loved interactions revealed a strong-link/mutual felt-unloved pattern: partners’ high felt-loved buffered the damaging effect of actors’ low felt-loved on destructive behavior, resulting in actors’ destructive behavior mostly occurring when both actors’ and partners’ felt-loved was low. This dyadic pattern also emerged in three supplemental daily sampling studies. Providing directional support for the strong-link/mutual felt-unloved pattern, in Studies 4 and 5 involving two or more sequential interactions, Actors’ × Partners’ Felt-Loved in one interaction predicted actors’ destructive behavior within couples’ subsequent conflict interactions. The results illustrate the dyadic nature of feeling loved: Partners feeling loved can protect against actors feeling unloved in challenging interactions. Assessing Actor × Partner effects should be equally valuable for advancing understanding of other fundamentally dyadic relationship processes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 367-396 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
Volume | 125 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 27 Feb 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 American Psychological Association
Funding
This research was supported by The John Templeton Foundation (Grant 61280) via project funding awarded by The Love Consortium to Eri Sasaki, a Royal Society of New Zealand (RSNZ) Marsden Fund (Grant UOA0811) awarded to Nickola C. Overall, a RSNZ Marsden grant (Grant UOA1712) awarded to Nickola C. Overall and Annette M. E. Henderson, a Fetzer Institute awarded to Harry T. Reis, and a Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Veni Grant 451-12-024) awarded to Francesca Righetti. The materials, data, and syntax for the results presented in this article are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/m4jnd/.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
John Templeton Foundation | 61280 |
Royal Society Te Apārangi | |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | 451-12-024 |
Marsden Fund | UOA0811, UOA1712 |
Keywords
- behavioral observation
- buffering
- destructive behavior
- love
- strong link