TY - JOUR
T1 - Feldspathic and lithium disilicate onlays with a 2-year follow-up
T2 - Split-mouth randomized clinical trial
AU - Saavedra, Guilherme De Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni
AU - Tribst, Joao Paulo Mendes
AU - De Carvalho Ramos, Nathalia
AU - De Melo, Renata Marques
AU - Rodrigues, Vinieius Aneas
AU - Ramos, Gabriela Freitas
AU - Bottino, M.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The present study was a prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical shortterm trial aiming to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesively luted, lithium disilicate and feldspathic glass-ceramics onlays over a period up to 2 years. A total of 11 patients (7 female, 4 male; age range: 18-60 years, mean age: 39 years) were selected for this study. Each patient received a maximum of two restorations per group in a split-mouth-design. LD: Eleven onlays, performed with lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and FP: Eleven onlays, performed with feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II, Vita Zanhfabrik, Bad Sackingen). Recalls were performed at 2 weeks (baseline = RI), 1 year (R2) and 2 years (R3) after the cementation by three calibrated blinded independent investigators using mirrors, magnifying eyeglasses, probes and bitewing radiographs. The postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, tooth integrity, and restoration integrity were evaluated. The Friedman test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in time-to-time comparison ofthe parameters in the ceramics restorations. A total of 95.4% of the restorations were clinically acceptable at the 2-year recall, without a difference for any evaluation parameter for both ceramic materials. Based on the 2-year data, the CAD-CAM onlays manufactured with feldspathic and lithium-disilicate based ceramics showed similar clinical performance.
AB - The present study was a prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical shortterm trial aiming to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesively luted, lithium disilicate and feldspathic glass-ceramics onlays over a period up to 2 years. A total of 11 patients (7 female, 4 male; age range: 18-60 years, mean age: 39 years) were selected for this study. Each patient received a maximum of two restorations per group in a split-mouth-design. LD: Eleven onlays, performed with lithium disilicate-based ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and FP: Eleven onlays, performed with feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II, Vita Zanhfabrik, Bad Sackingen). Recalls were performed at 2 weeks (baseline = RI), 1 year (R2) and 2 years (R3) after the cementation by three calibrated blinded independent investigators using mirrors, magnifying eyeglasses, probes and bitewing radiographs. The postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, color match, surface roughness, tooth integrity, and restoration integrity were evaluated. The Friedman test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in time-to-time comparison ofthe parameters in the ceramics restorations. A total of 95.4% of the restorations were clinically acceptable at the 2-year recall, without a difference for any evaluation parameter for both ceramic materials. Based on the 2-year data, the CAD-CAM onlays manufactured with feldspathic and lithium-disilicate based ceramics showed similar clinical performance.
KW - Ceramics
KW - Dental materials
KW - Resin cements
KW - Tooth sensitivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117813717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117813717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1590/0103-6440202104080
DO - 10.1590/0103-6440202104080
M3 - Article
C2 - 34614061
AN - SCOPUS:85117813717
SN - 0103-6440
VL - 32
SP - 53
EP - 63
JO - Brazilian Dental Journal
JF - Brazilian Dental Journal
IS - 2
ER -