Finding flicker: Critical differences in temporal frequency capture attention

John Cass, Erik Van der Burg, David Alais

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Rapid visual flicker is known to capture attention. Here we show slow flicker can also capture attention under reciprocal temporal conditions. Observers searched for a target line (vertical or horizontal) among tilted distractors. Distractor lines were surrounded by luminance modulating annuli, all flickering sinusoidally at 1.3 or 12.1 Hz, while the target's annulus flickered at frequencies within this range. Search times improved with increasing target/distractor frequency differences. For target-distractor frequency separations >5Hz reaction times were minimal with high-frequency targets correctly identified more rapidly than low frequency targets (~400 ms). Critically, however, at these optimal frequency sep-arations search times for low and high-frequency targets were unaffected by set size (slow flicker popped out from high flicker, and vice versa), indicating parallel and symmetric search performance when searching for high or low frequency targets. In a "cost" experiment using 1.3 and 12.1 Hz flicker, the unique flickering annulus sometimes surrounded a distrac-tor and, on other trials, surrounded the target. When centered on a distractor, the unique frequency produced a clear and symmetrical search cost. Together, these symmetric pop-out and search costs demonstrate that temporal frequency is a pre-attentive visual feature capable of capturing attention, and that it is relative rather than absolute frequencies that are critical. The shape of the search functions strongly suggest that early visual temporal frequency filters underlie these effects. © 2011 Cass, Van der Burg and Alais.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 320
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume2
Issue numberNOV
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Finding flicker: Critical differences in temporal frequency capture attention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this