Finish line plant–insect interactions mediated by insect feeding mode and plant interference: a case study of Brassica interactions with diamondback moth and turnip aphid

Mahmoud Soufbaf, Yaghoub Fathipour*, Jeffrey A. Harvey, Cang Hui

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    43 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    There are gaps in our understanding of plant responses under different insect phytophagy modes and their subsequent effects on the insect herbivores’ performance at late season. Here we compared different types of insect feeding by an aphid, Lipaphis erysimi, and a lepidopteran, Plutella xylostella, and how this affected defensive metabolites in leaves of 2 Brassica species when plants gain maturity. Thiocyanate concentrations after P. xylostella and L. erysimi feeding activities were the same. Total phenolics was higher after the phloem feeder feeding than the folivore activity. The plants compensatory responses (i.e., tolerance) to L. erysimi feeding was significantly higher than the responses to P. xylostella. This study showed that L. erysimi had higher carbon than P. xylostella whereas nitrogen in P. xylostella was 1.42 times that in L. erysimi. Population size of the phloem feeder was not affected by plant species or insect coexistence. However, there was no correlation between plant defensive metabolites and both insects’ population size and biomass. This suggests that plant root biomass and tolerance index after different insect herbivory modes are not necessarily unidirectional. Importantly, the interaction between the folivore and the phloem feeder insects is asymmetric and the phloem feeder might be a trickier problem for plants than the folivore. Moreover, as both plants’ common and special defenses decreased under interspecific interference, we suggest that specialist insect herbivores can be more challenged in ecosystems in which plants are not involved in interspecific interference.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)690-702
    Number of pages13
    JournalInsect Science
    Volume25
    Issue number4
    Early online date16 Jan 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

    Funding

    This study was funded by Tarbiat Modares University and Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) (grant number 91058913). CH is supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant nos. 81825 and 76912). We thank B. Salehi for her technical help in insect and plant sampling in the experiments. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. There are no disputes over the ownership of the data presented in the paper and all contributions have been attributed via coauthorship and acknowledgement.

    FundersFunder number
    National Kidney Foundation of South Africa76912, 81825
    Iran National Science Foundation91058913
    Tarbiat Modares University

      Keywords

      • glucosinolates
      • herbivory mode
      • plant resistance
      • stoichiometric analysis
      • tolerance

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Finish line plant–insect interactions mediated by insect feeding mode and plant interference: a case study of Brassica interactions with diamondback moth and turnip aphid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this