Five pathways into one profession: Fifty years of debate on differentiated nursing practice

Hugo Schalkwijk*, Martijn Felder, Pieterbas Lalleman, Manon S. Parry, Lisette Schoonhoven, Iris Wallenburg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The persistence of multiple educational pathways into the nursing profession continues to occupy scholars internationally. In the Netherlands, various groups within the Dutch healthcare sector have tried to differentiate nursing practice on the basis of educational backgrounds for over 50 years. Proponents argue that such reforms are needed to retain bachelor-trained nurses, improve quality of care and strengthen nurses' position in the sector. Opponents have actively resisted reforms because they would mainly benefit bachelor-trained nurses and neglect practical experience and technical skills. This historical case study aims to provide insight in this apparent stalemate. Our analysis of this debate is informed by literature on institutional work and current debates within the historiography of nursing. This study contributes to a better understanding of this contemporary debate by examining a broader timeframe than is usually studied, and by highlighting nurses' roles in complex processes of change. We argue that, rather than being stuck in their professional development, different groups of nurses have forged their own path forward in their professional development, albeit via different strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12631
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalNursing Inquiry
Volume31
Issue number3
Early online date12 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Nursing Inquiry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Funding

We would like to thank all participants who contributed to this study. We also thank the RN2Blend consortium members, including Hester Vermeulen (director), Julia van Kraaij (Netherlands, Radboud University Medical Center), Catharina van Oostveen (Netherlands, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital), Dewi Stalpers (Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht), Dieke Martini, Jet Spits (the Netherlands, Fontys University of Applied Sciences Eindhoven), Roland Bal, Lucas Goossens, Syb Kuijper and Nienke Miedema (Netherlands, Erasmus University Rotterdam), for their constructive feedback and contributions to this study. This qualitative historical case study is part of a wider research programme called RN2Blend. RN2Blend is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. This qualitative historical case study is part of a wider research programme funded by the Dutch government called Registered Nurses to Blend (RN2Blend). The programme is conducted by an independent consortium consisting of Dutch universities and hospital organizations and aims to investigate the implementation of differentiated nursing practice in the Netherlands (Lalleman et al., 2020 ).

FundersFunder number
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Dutch government called Registered Nurses
Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport
University Medical Center Utrecht
Fontys University of Applied Sciences Eindhoven

    Keywords

    • education
    • historical research
    • politics
    • professional development
    • professionalization

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Five pathways into one profession: Fifty years of debate on differentiated nursing practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this