Five-year-olds' facial mimicry following social ostracism is modulated by attachment security

Stefania V. Vacaru*, Johanna E. Van Schaik, Erik De Water, Sabine Hunnius

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Social ostracism triggers an increase in affiliative behaviours. One such behaviour is the rapid copying of others' facial expressions, called facial mimicry. Insofar, it remains unknown how individual differences in intrinsic affiliation motivation regulate responses to social ostracism during early development. We examined children's facial mimicry following ostracism as modulated by individual differences in the affiliation motivation, expressed in their attachment tendencies. Resistant and avoidant tendencies are characterized by high and low affiliation motivation, and were hypothesized to lead to facial mimicry enhancement or suppression towards an ostracizing partner, respectively. Following an ostracism manipulation in which children played a virtual game (Cyberball) with an includer and an excluder peer, mimicry of the two peers' happy and sad facial expressions was recorded with electromyography (EMG). Attachment was assessed via parent-report questionnaire. We found that 5-year-olds smiled to sad facial expressions of the excluder peer, while they showed no facial reactions for the includer peer. Neither resistant nor avoidant tendencies predicted facial mimicry to the excluder peer. Yet, securely attached children smiled towards the excluder peer, when sad facial expressions were displayed. In conclusion, these findings suggest a modulation of facial reactions following ostracism by early attachment.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0240680
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Dec 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Five-year-olds' facial mimicry following social ostracism is modulated by attachment security'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this