Flood Governance: A multiple country comparison of stakeholder perceptions and aspirations

Ryan Plummer, Julia Baird*, Ryan Bullock, Angela Dzyundzyak, Diane Dupont, Åsa Gerger Swartling, Åse Johannessen, Dave Huitema, Anna Lyth, Maria de Lourdes Melo Zurita, Stefania Munaretto, Timothy Smith, Dana Thomsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Flooding is routinely among the most disastrous annual events worldwide with extensive impacts on human wellbeing, economies and ecosystems. Thus, how decisions are made about floods (i.e. flood governance) is extremely important and evidence shows that it is changing, with non-governmental actors (civil society and the private sector) becoming involved in new and sometimes hybrid governance arrangements. This study investigates how stakeholders perceive floods to be governed and how they believe decision-making ought to occur, with the intent of determining to what extent changing governance is evident on the ground and how well (or poorly) it aligns with desired governance arrangements. Flood governance stakeholders were surveyed in five flood-prone geographical areas from Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. The findings suggest that a reconfiguration of flood governance is underway with relatively little consensus regarding the specific arrangements and mechanisms in place during this transitionary period. Across the five cases, stakeholders indicated that they wanted flood governance to be organized at multiple levels, with strong government involvement and with diverse actor groups, and through mechanisms that match the involvement of these actors, with a lack of desirability for some specific configurations involving the private sector in particular. There was little alignment between stakeholder perceptions of governance currently in place and their desired arrangements, except for government involvement. Future research directions highlight the importance of the inclusion of stakeholder perspectives in assessing flood governance, and following the transition in flood governance over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-81
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Policy and Governance
Volume28
Issue number2
Early online date19 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Funding

This work was completed as part of the CADWAGO (Climate Adaptation and Water Governance) project. We gratefully acknowledge financial support for the CADWAGO project from Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, the Volkswagen Stiftung and Compagnia di San Paolo through the Europe and Global Challenges programme and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB). We appreciate the participation of stakeholders from case studies in Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. Finally, we would like to thank Marilyne Jollineau, Wendee Kubik, Gary Pickering and Liette Vasseur for their input in developing the survey instrument.

FundersFunder number
Compagnia di San Paolo
Volkswagen Foundation
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd och Beredskap

    Keywords

    • flood governance
    • floods
    • perceptions of governance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Flood Governance: A multiple country comparison of stakeholder perceptions and aspirations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this