Foraging for high caloric anthropogenic prey is energetically costly

Susanne Van Donk, Judy Shamoun-Baranes, Jaap Van Der Meer, Kees C.J. Camphuysen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Several generalist species benefit from food provided by human activities. Food from anthropogenic sources is often high in caloric value and can positively influence reproductive success or survival. However, this type of resource may require specific foraging skills and habitat experience with related costs and benefits. As a result, not all individuals utilize these resources equally, with some individuals preferentially foraging in habitats where natural resources of lower energy content are predominant, possibly due to lower energy expenditure of the specific foraging strategy. Methods: Here we investigate whether foraging in habitats which contain high caloric resources of anthropogenic origin is energetically costlier than foraging in habitats with low caloric resources such as intertidal areas or agricultural and natural areas, for example due to increased flight costs, in a generalist seabird, the herring gull Larus argentatus. We use data from GPS trackers with tri-Axial acceleration measurements that allow us to quantify time-energy budgets, representing energy expenditure during foraging trips of herring gulls for each habitat. Results: We show that the rate of energy expenditure is on average 34% higher when individuals forage for high caloric prey in marine and urban areas compared to foraging for low caloric prey in intertidal and agricultural areas. Energetic estimates suggest that if birds would feed completely on these resources, they have to gather ~ 400 kJ per day more to compensate for the higher foraging costs. Conclusions: Energy expenditure differs among foraging habitat and may thereby influence foraging decisions of individual herring gulls. As management of anthropogenic resources changes, so too may the costs and potential benefits of foraging strategies which are strongly tied to human activities.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17
JournalMovement Ecology
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2019

Fingerprint

foraging
expenditure
habitat
resource
Larus argentatus
energy
energy expenditure
cost
generalist
habitats
human activity
agricultural land
food
anthropogenic source
physical activity
seabird
energy budget
reproductive success
forage
natural resource

Keywords

  • Anthropogenic impact
  • Energy expenditure
  • Foraging strategies
  • Larus argentatus
  • Movement

Cite this

Van Donk, Susanne ; Shamoun-Baranes, Judy ; Van Der Meer, Jaap ; Camphuysen, Kees C.J. / Foraging for high caloric anthropogenic prey is energetically costly. In: Movement Ecology. 2019 ; Vol. 7.
@article{2db8aecc03474334829449a5032641dd,
title = "Foraging for high caloric anthropogenic prey is energetically costly",
abstract = "Background: Several generalist species benefit from food provided by human activities. Food from anthropogenic sources is often high in caloric value and can positively influence reproductive success or survival. However, this type of resource may require specific foraging skills and habitat experience with related costs and benefits. As a result, not all individuals utilize these resources equally, with some individuals preferentially foraging in habitats where natural resources of lower energy content are predominant, possibly due to lower energy expenditure of the specific foraging strategy. Methods: Here we investigate whether foraging in habitats which contain high caloric resources of anthropogenic origin is energetically costlier than foraging in habitats with low caloric resources such as intertidal areas or agricultural and natural areas, for example due to increased flight costs, in a generalist seabird, the herring gull Larus argentatus. We use data from GPS trackers with tri-Axial acceleration measurements that allow us to quantify time-energy budgets, representing energy expenditure during foraging trips of herring gulls for each habitat. Results: We show that the rate of energy expenditure is on average 34{\%} higher when individuals forage for high caloric prey in marine and urban areas compared to foraging for low caloric prey in intertidal and agricultural areas. Energetic estimates suggest that if birds would feed completely on these resources, they have to gather ~ 400 kJ per day more to compensate for the higher foraging costs. Conclusions: Energy expenditure differs among foraging habitat and may thereby influence foraging decisions of individual herring gulls. As management of anthropogenic resources changes, so too may the costs and potential benefits of foraging strategies which are strongly tied to human activities.",
keywords = "Anthropogenic impact, Energy expenditure, Foraging strategies, Larus argentatus, Movement",
author = "{Van Donk}, Susanne and Judy Shamoun-Baranes and {Van Der Meer}, Jaap and Camphuysen, {Kees C.J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1186/s40462-019-0159-3",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Movement Ecology",
issn = "2051-3933",
publisher = "Springer_Verlag",

}

Foraging for high caloric anthropogenic prey is energetically costly. / Van Donk, Susanne; Shamoun-Baranes, Judy; Van Der Meer, Jaap; Camphuysen, Kees C.J.

In: Movement Ecology, Vol. 7, 17, 24.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Foraging for high caloric anthropogenic prey is energetically costly

AU - Van Donk, Susanne

AU - Shamoun-Baranes, Judy

AU - Van Der Meer, Jaap

AU - Camphuysen, Kees C.J.

PY - 2019/5/24

Y1 - 2019/5/24

N2 - Background: Several generalist species benefit from food provided by human activities. Food from anthropogenic sources is often high in caloric value and can positively influence reproductive success or survival. However, this type of resource may require specific foraging skills and habitat experience with related costs and benefits. As a result, not all individuals utilize these resources equally, with some individuals preferentially foraging in habitats where natural resources of lower energy content are predominant, possibly due to lower energy expenditure of the specific foraging strategy. Methods: Here we investigate whether foraging in habitats which contain high caloric resources of anthropogenic origin is energetically costlier than foraging in habitats with low caloric resources such as intertidal areas or agricultural and natural areas, for example due to increased flight costs, in a generalist seabird, the herring gull Larus argentatus. We use data from GPS trackers with tri-Axial acceleration measurements that allow us to quantify time-energy budgets, representing energy expenditure during foraging trips of herring gulls for each habitat. Results: We show that the rate of energy expenditure is on average 34% higher when individuals forage for high caloric prey in marine and urban areas compared to foraging for low caloric prey in intertidal and agricultural areas. Energetic estimates suggest that if birds would feed completely on these resources, they have to gather ~ 400 kJ per day more to compensate for the higher foraging costs. Conclusions: Energy expenditure differs among foraging habitat and may thereby influence foraging decisions of individual herring gulls. As management of anthropogenic resources changes, so too may the costs and potential benefits of foraging strategies which are strongly tied to human activities.

AB - Background: Several generalist species benefit from food provided by human activities. Food from anthropogenic sources is often high in caloric value and can positively influence reproductive success or survival. However, this type of resource may require specific foraging skills and habitat experience with related costs and benefits. As a result, not all individuals utilize these resources equally, with some individuals preferentially foraging in habitats where natural resources of lower energy content are predominant, possibly due to lower energy expenditure of the specific foraging strategy. Methods: Here we investigate whether foraging in habitats which contain high caloric resources of anthropogenic origin is energetically costlier than foraging in habitats with low caloric resources such as intertidal areas or agricultural and natural areas, for example due to increased flight costs, in a generalist seabird, the herring gull Larus argentatus. We use data from GPS trackers with tri-Axial acceleration measurements that allow us to quantify time-energy budgets, representing energy expenditure during foraging trips of herring gulls for each habitat. Results: We show that the rate of energy expenditure is on average 34% higher when individuals forage for high caloric prey in marine and urban areas compared to foraging for low caloric prey in intertidal and agricultural areas. Energetic estimates suggest that if birds would feed completely on these resources, they have to gather ~ 400 kJ per day more to compensate for the higher foraging costs. Conclusions: Energy expenditure differs among foraging habitat and may thereby influence foraging decisions of individual herring gulls. As management of anthropogenic resources changes, so too may the costs and potential benefits of foraging strategies which are strongly tied to human activities.

KW - Anthropogenic impact

KW - Energy expenditure

KW - Foraging strategies

KW - Larus argentatus

KW - Movement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066401869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066401869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40462-019-0159-3

DO - 10.1186/s40462-019-0159-3

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Movement Ecology

JF - Movement Ecology

SN - 2051-3933

M1 - 17

ER -