Formal controls and team adaptability in new product development projects

Nina Detzen, Frank H.M. Verbeeten, Nils Gamm, Klaus Möller

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of two formal controls, namely target rigidity and process autonomy, on team adaptability and project success in new product development (NPD) projects. Target rigidity refers to performance goals that are non-negotiable once they have been set. Process autonomy refers to the extent to which a project team is free to choose ways to achieve its goals. Team adaptability is considered a key factor that explains the relationship between formal controls and project success. Design/methodology/approach: Two separate models related to resource and cost measures are analysed, since different target types may influence managerial perceptions. This study uses data collected from a survey with 113 project managers as respondents. Findings: The findings show that target rigidity and process autonomy support team adaptability. Furthermore, team adaptability mediates the impact of formal controls on project success. The effects are more pronounced for cost targets as compared to resource targets. Practical implications: Firms can increase project success by using formal controls in such a way that they allow project managers to provide their teams with motivating guidelines (target rigidity) and discretion (process autonomy) to adapt to new circumstances. Originality/value: This study reveals the impact of formal controls on NPD project success through team adaptability. A balanced use of target rigidity and process autonomy may help improving NPD project success.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1541-1558
Number of pages18
JournalManagement Decision
Volume56
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Adaptability
Formal control
Development projects
New product development
Project success
Rigidity
Autonomy
Resources
Project manager
Discretion
Target cost
Design methodology
Factors
Managerial perceptions
Project teams
Costs

Keywords

  • Formal controls
  • New product development projects
  • Performance measure use
  • Team adaptability

Cite this

Detzen, Nina ; Verbeeten, Frank H.M. ; Gamm, Nils ; Möller, Klaus. / Formal controls and team adaptability in new product development projects. In: Management Decision. 2018 ; Vol. 56, No. 7. pp. 1541-1558.
@article{1996c1df7e6c413d945c822b0c004967,
title = "Formal controls and team adaptability in new product development projects",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of two formal controls, namely target rigidity and process autonomy, on team adaptability and project success in new product development (NPD) projects. Target rigidity refers to performance goals that are non-negotiable once they have been set. Process autonomy refers to the extent to which a project team is free to choose ways to achieve its goals. Team adaptability is considered a key factor that explains the relationship between formal controls and project success. Design/methodology/approach: Two separate models related to resource and cost measures are analysed, since different target types may influence managerial perceptions. This study uses data collected from a survey with 113 project managers as respondents. Findings: The findings show that target rigidity and process autonomy support team adaptability. Furthermore, team adaptability mediates the impact of formal controls on project success. The effects are more pronounced for cost targets as compared to resource targets. Practical implications: Firms can increase project success by using formal controls in such a way that they allow project managers to provide their teams with motivating guidelines (target rigidity) and discretion (process autonomy) to adapt to new circumstances. Originality/value: This study reveals the impact of formal controls on NPD project success through team adaptability. A balanced use of target rigidity and process autonomy may help improving NPD project success.",
keywords = "Formal controls, New product development projects, Performance measure use, Team adaptability",
author = "Nina Detzen and Verbeeten, {Frank H.M.} and Nils Gamm and Klaus M{\"o}ller",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1108/MD-07-2017-0692",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1541--1558",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

Formal controls and team adaptability in new product development projects. / Detzen, Nina; Verbeeten, Frank H.M.; Gamm, Nils; Möller, Klaus.

In: Management Decision, Vol. 56, No. 7, 29.03.2018, p. 1541-1558.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Formal controls and team adaptability in new product development projects

AU - Detzen, Nina

AU - Verbeeten, Frank H.M.

AU - Gamm, Nils

AU - Möller, Klaus

PY - 2018/3/29

Y1 - 2018/3/29

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of two formal controls, namely target rigidity and process autonomy, on team adaptability and project success in new product development (NPD) projects. Target rigidity refers to performance goals that are non-negotiable once they have been set. Process autonomy refers to the extent to which a project team is free to choose ways to achieve its goals. Team adaptability is considered a key factor that explains the relationship between formal controls and project success. Design/methodology/approach: Two separate models related to resource and cost measures are analysed, since different target types may influence managerial perceptions. This study uses data collected from a survey with 113 project managers as respondents. Findings: The findings show that target rigidity and process autonomy support team adaptability. Furthermore, team adaptability mediates the impact of formal controls on project success. The effects are more pronounced for cost targets as compared to resource targets. Practical implications: Firms can increase project success by using formal controls in such a way that they allow project managers to provide their teams with motivating guidelines (target rigidity) and discretion (process autonomy) to adapt to new circumstances. Originality/value: This study reveals the impact of formal controls on NPD project success through team adaptability. A balanced use of target rigidity and process autonomy may help improving NPD project success.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of two formal controls, namely target rigidity and process autonomy, on team adaptability and project success in new product development (NPD) projects. Target rigidity refers to performance goals that are non-negotiable once they have been set. Process autonomy refers to the extent to which a project team is free to choose ways to achieve its goals. Team adaptability is considered a key factor that explains the relationship between formal controls and project success. Design/methodology/approach: Two separate models related to resource and cost measures are analysed, since different target types may influence managerial perceptions. This study uses data collected from a survey with 113 project managers as respondents. Findings: The findings show that target rigidity and process autonomy support team adaptability. Furthermore, team adaptability mediates the impact of formal controls on project success. The effects are more pronounced for cost targets as compared to resource targets. Practical implications: Firms can increase project success by using formal controls in such a way that they allow project managers to provide their teams with motivating guidelines (target rigidity) and discretion (process autonomy) to adapt to new circumstances. Originality/value: This study reveals the impact of formal controls on NPD project success through team adaptability. A balanced use of target rigidity and process autonomy may help improving NPD project success.

KW - Formal controls

KW - New product development projects

KW - Performance measure use

KW - Team adaptability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044771458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044771458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/MD-07-2017-0692

DO - 10.1108/MD-07-2017-0692

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 1541

EP - 1558

JO - Management Decision

T2 - Management Decision

JF - Management Decision

SN - 0025-1747

IS - 7

ER -