Formal Semantics of Temporal Epistemic Reflection

W. van der Hoek, J.J. Meyer, J. Treur

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Meta-level architectures often are used either to model dynamic control of the object level inferences, or to extend the inference relation of the object level. In [Treur, 1992] we introduced formal semantics for meta-level architectures of the first kind based on temporal models. It may be considered quite natural that for such a dynamic type of reasoning system the temporal element of the reasoning should be made explicit in the formal semantics. For the use of meta-level architectures to extend the object level inference relation the situation looks different. In principle one may work out formal semantics in terms of (the logic behind) this extended, non-classical inference relation; e.g., as in the literature for nonmonotonic logics. However, much discussion is possible about this case. Some papers argue that also in the case of a non-monotonic logic the semantics have to make the inherent temporal element explicit; approaches are described in, e.g., [Gabbay, 1982], [Engelfriet and Treur, 1993]. In the current paper we adopt this line.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDynamics and Management of Reasoning Processes
EditorsD. Gabbay
PublisherKluwer Academic
Pages41-64
ISBN (Electronic)978-94-017-1743-4
ISBN (Print)978-90-481-5903-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Publication series

NameSeries in Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems
Volume6

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Formal Semantics of Temporal Epistemic Reflection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this