Abstract
Medical guidelines can significantly improve quality of medical care and reduce costs. But how do we get sound and well-structured guidelines? This paper investigates the use of quality indicators that are formulated by medical institutions to evaluate medical care. The main research questions are (i) whether it is possible to formalise those indicators in a specific knowledge representation language for medical guidelines, and (ii) whether it is possible to verify whether such guidelines do indeed satisfy these indicators. In a case study on two real-life guidelines (Diabetes and Jaundice) we have studied 35 indicators, that were developped independently from these guidelines. Of these 25 (71%!) suggested anomalies in one of the guidelines in our case study.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) |
| Pages | 201-210 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Volume | 3581 LNAI |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Event | 10th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, AIME 2005 - Aberdeen, United Kingdom Duration: 23 Jul 2005 → 27 Jul 2005 |
Publication series
| Name | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) |
|---|---|
| Volume | 3581 LNAI |
| ISSN (Print) | 03029743 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 16113349 |
Conference
| Conference | 10th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, AIME 2005 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Aberdeen |
| Period | 23/07/05 → 27/07/05 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver