Formation of the crater suevite sequence from the Chicxulub peak ring: A petrographic, geochemical, and sedimentological characterization

Pim Kaskes*, Sietze J. de Graaff, Jean Guillaume Feignon, Thomas Déhais, Steven Goderis, Ludovic Ferrière, Christian Koeberl, Jan Smit, Axel Wittmann, Sean P.S. Gulick, Vinciane Debaille, Nadine Mattielli, Philippe Claeys

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study presents a new classification of a ~100-m-thick crater suevite sequence in the recent International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP)-International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP) Expedition 364 Hole M0077A drill core to better understand the formation of suevite on top of the Chicxulub peak ring. We provide an extensive data set for this succession that consists of whole-rock major and trace element compositional data (n = 212) and petrographic data supported by digital image analysis. The suevite sequence is subdivided into three units that are distinct in their petrography, geochemistry, and sedimentology, from base to top: the ~5.6-m-thick non-graded suevite unit, the ~89-m-thick graded suevite unit, and the ~3.5-m-thick bedded suevite unit. All of these suevite units have isolated Cretaceous planktic foraminifera within their clastic groundmass, which suggests that marine processes were responsible for the deposition of the entire M0077A suevite sequence. The most likely scenario describes that the first ocean water that reached the northern peak ring region entered through a N-NE gap in the Chicxulub outer rim. We estimate that this ocean water arrived at Site M0077 within 30 minutes after the impact and was relatively poor in rock debris. This water caused intense quench fragmentation when it interacted with the underlying hot impact melt rock, and this resulted in the emplacement of the ~5.6-m-thick hyaloclastite-like, non-graded suevite unit. In the following hours, the impact structure was flooded by an ocean resurge rich in rock debris, which caused the phreatomagmatic processes to stop and the ~89-m-thick graded suevite unit to be deposited. We interpret that after the energy of the resurge slowly dissipated, oscillating seiche waves took over the sedimentary regime and formed the ~3.5-m-thick bedded suevite unit. The final stages of the formation of the impactite sequence (estimated to be <20 years after impact) were dominated by resuspension and slow atmospheric settling, including the final deposition of Chicxulub impactor debris. Cumulatively, the Site M0077 suevite sequence from the Chicxulub impact site preserved a high-resolution record that provides an unprecedented window for unravelling the dynamics and timing of proximal marine cratering processes in the direct aftermath of a large impact event.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)895-927
    Number of pages33
    JournalBulletin of the Geological Society of America
    Volume134
    Issue number3-4
    Early online date9 Jul 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    We appreciate the constructive reviews from David King and Ralf Thomas Schmitt that have strengthened this manuscript. We also thank associate editor Wolf Uwe Reimold for his review and editorial handling. This research is financially supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy (BELSPO) Project Chicxulub and the Research Foundation–Flanders (FWO) Project G0A6517N. Pim Kaskes thanks FWO for the awarded Ph.D. fellowship (Project 11E6619N, 11E6621N), and Philippe Claeys thanks the FWO–Hercules Program for financing the µXRF instrument at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Steven Goderis, Vin-ciane Debaille, Nadine Matielli, and Philippe Claeys thank the Excellence of Science Project “ET-HoME” for support. Vinciane Debaille also thanks FRS-FNRS for support. We are grateful to Quinten van Gaever (Ghent University), Sander op de Beeck (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), and Ruben Vandijck (Katho-lieke Universiteit Leuven) for petrographic, µXRF, and bulk geochemical analysis as part of their Masters’ theses. Robin Francotte (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) is thanked for processing of µXRF maps of thin sections. Wendy Debouge and Sabrina Cauchies (both Université Libre de Bruxelles) are thanked for their assistance with sample preparation and analytical procedures for bulk ICP-OES and ICP-MS analysis at Laboratoire G-Time, Université Libre de Bruxelles. We thank Priya Laha (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium) and Dan Topa (Natural History Museum, Vienna) for access to and assistance with scanning electron microscope and microprobe analyses. Partial funding in Vienna was provided by the University of Vienna doctoral school IK-1045 (P.I.: Christian Koe-berl). We also thank Peter Nagl and Dieter Mader (both at University of Vienna) for help with bulk XRF and INAA work, respectively. Axel Wittmann received funding from National Science Foundation grant OCE-1737087. This research used samples and data provided by International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364, which was jointly funded by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling and International Continental Scientific Drilling Program, with contributions and logistical support from the Yucatán State Government and National Autonomous University of Mexico. This is University of Texas Institute for Geophysics Contribution #3781 and Center of Planetary Systems Habitability #0029.

    Funding Information:
    We appreciate the constructive reviews from David King and Ralf Thomas Schmitt that have strengthened this manuscript. We also thank associate editor Wolf Uwe Reimold for his review and editorial handling. This research is financially supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy (BELSPO) Project Chicxulub and the Research Foundation?Flanders (FWO) Project G0A6517N. Pim Kaskes thanks FWO for the awarded Ph.D. fellowship (Project 11E6619N, 11E6621N), and Philippe Claeys thanks the FWO?Hercules Program for financing the ?XRF instrument at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Steven Goderis, Vinciane Debaille, Nadine Matielli, and Philippe Claeys thank the Excellence of Science Project ?ET-HoME? for support. Vinciane Debaille also thanks FRS-FNRS for support. We are grateful to Quinten van Gaever (Ghent University), Sander op de Beeck (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), and Ruben Vandijck (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) for petrographic, ?XRF, and bulk geochemical analysis as part of their Masters? theses. Robin Francotte (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) is thanked for processing of ?XRF maps of thin sections. Wendy Debouge and Sabrina Cauchies (both Universit? Libre de Bruxelles) are thanked for their assistance with sample preparation and analytical procedures for bulk ICP-OES and ICP-MS analysis at Laboratoire G-Time, Universit? Libre de Bruxelles. We thank Priya Laha (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium) and Dan Topa (Natural History Museum, Vienna) for access to and assistance with scanning electron microscope and microprobe analyses. Partial funding in Vienna was provided by the University of Vienna doctoral school IK-1045 (P.I.: Christian Koeberl). We also thank Peter Nagl and Dieter Mader (both at University of Vienna) for help with bulk XRF and INAA work, respectively. Axel Wittmann received funding from National Science Foundation grant OCE-1737087. This research used samples and data provided by International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364, which was jointly funded by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling and International Continental Scientific Drilling Program, with contributions and logistical support from the Yucat?n State Government and National Autonomous University of Mexico. This is University of Texas Institute for Geophysics Contribution #3781 and Center of Planetary Systems Habitability #0029.

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2021 The Authors. Gold Open Access

    Funding

    We appreciate the constructive reviews from David King and Ralf Thomas Schmitt that have strengthened this manuscript. We also thank associate editor Wolf Uwe Reimold for his review and editorial handling. This research is financially supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy (BELSPO) Project Chicxulub and the Research Foundation–Flanders (FWO) Project G0A6517N. Pim Kaskes thanks FWO for the awarded Ph.D. fellowship (Project 11E6619N, 11E6621N), and Philippe Claeys thanks the FWO–Hercules Program for financing the µXRF instrument at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Steven Goderis, Vin-ciane Debaille, Nadine Matielli, and Philippe Claeys thank the Excellence of Science Project “ET-HoME” for support. Vinciane Debaille also thanks FRS-FNRS for support. We are grateful to Quinten van Gaever (Ghent University), Sander op de Beeck (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), and Ruben Vandijck (Katho-lieke Universiteit Leuven) for petrographic, µXRF, and bulk geochemical analysis as part of their Masters’ theses. Robin Francotte (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) is thanked for processing of µXRF maps of thin sections. Wendy Debouge and Sabrina Cauchies (both Université Libre de Bruxelles) are thanked for their assistance with sample preparation and analytical procedures for bulk ICP-OES and ICP-MS analysis at Laboratoire G-Time, Université Libre de Bruxelles. We thank Priya Laha (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium) and Dan Topa (Natural History Museum, Vienna) for access to and assistance with scanning electron microscope and microprobe analyses. Partial funding in Vienna was provided by the University of Vienna doctoral school IK-1045 (P.I.: Christian Koe-berl). We also thank Peter Nagl and Dieter Mader (both at University of Vienna) for help with bulk XRF and INAA work, respectively. Axel Wittmann received funding from National Science Foundation grant OCE-1737087. This research used samples and data provided by International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364, which was jointly funded by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling and International Continental Scientific Drilling Program, with contributions and logistical support from the Yucatán State Government and National Autonomous University of Mexico. This is University of Texas Institute for Geophysics Contribution #3781 and Center of Planetary Systems Habitability #0029. We appreciate the constructive reviews from David King and Ralf Thomas Schmitt that have strengthened this manuscript. We also thank associate editor Wolf Uwe Reimold for his review and editorial handling. This research is financially supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy (BELSPO) Project Chicxulub and the Research Foundation?Flanders (FWO) Project G0A6517N. Pim Kaskes thanks FWO for the awarded Ph.D. fellowship (Project 11E6619N, 11E6621N), and Philippe Claeys thanks the FWO?Hercules Program for financing the ?XRF instrument at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Steven Goderis, Vinciane Debaille, Nadine Matielli, and Philippe Claeys thank the Excellence of Science Project ?ET-HoME? for support. Vinciane Debaille also thanks FRS-FNRS for support. We are grateful to Quinten van Gaever (Ghent University), Sander op de Beeck (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), and Ruben Vandijck (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) for petrographic, ?XRF, and bulk geochemical analysis as part of their Masters? theses. Robin Francotte (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) is thanked for processing of ?XRF maps of thin sections. Wendy Debouge and Sabrina Cauchies (both Universit? Libre de Bruxelles) are thanked for their assistance with sample preparation and analytical procedures for bulk ICP-OES and ICP-MS analysis at Laboratoire G-Time, Universit? Libre de Bruxelles. We thank Priya Laha (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium) and Dan Topa (Natural History Museum, Vienna) for access to and assistance with scanning electron microscope and microprobe analyses. Partial funding in Vienna was provided by the University of Vienna doctoral school IK-1045 (P.I.: Christian Koeberl). We also thank Peter Nagl and Dieter Mader (both at University of Vienna) for help with bulk XRF and INAA work, respectively. Axel Wittmann received funding from National Science Foundation grant OCE-1737087. This research used samples and data provided by International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364, which was jointly funded by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling and International Continental Scientific Drilling Program, with contributions and logistical support from the Yucat?n State Government and National Autonomous University of Mexico. This is University of Texas Institute for Geophysics Contribution #3781 and Center of Planetary Systems Habitability #0029.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Formation of the crater suevite sequence from the Chicxulub peak ring: A petrographic, geochemical, and sedimentological characterization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this