Forming the Moon for terrestrial silicate-rich material

R. de Meijer, V.F. Anisichkin, W. van Westrenen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recent high-precision measurements of the isotopic composition of lunar rocks demonstrate that the bulk silicate Earth and the Moon show an unexpectedly high degree of similarity. This is inconsistent with one of the primary results of classic dynamical simulations of the widely accepted giant impact model for the formation of the Moon, namely that most of the mass of the Moon originates from the impactor, not Earth.Resolution of this discrepancy without changing the main premises of the giant impact model requires total isotopic homogenisation of Earth and impactor material after the impact for a wide range of elements including oxygen, silicon, potassium, titanium, neodymium, and tungsten. Isotopic exchange between partially molten and vaporised Earth and Moon shortly after the impact has been invoked to explain the identical oxygen isotopic composition of Moon and Earth but the effectiveness and dynamics of this process are contested. Even if this process could explain the O isotope similarity, it is unlikely to work for the much heavier, refractory elements. Given the increasing uncertainty surrounding the giant impact model in light of these geochemical data, alternative hypotheses for lunar formation should be explored.In this paper, we revisit the hypothesis that the Moon was formed directly from terrestrial mantle material, as first proposed in the 'fission' hypothesis (Darwin, 1879. On the bodily tides of viscous and semi-elastic spheroids, and on the ocean tides upon a yielding nucleus. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 170, 1-35). We show that the dynamics of this scenario requires on the order of 10
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-49
JournalChemical Geology
Issue number345
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Silicates
Moon
silicate
Earth (planet)
Tides
isotopic composition
Oxygen
Neodymium
ocean tide
neodymium
oxygen
Tungsten
Silicon
tungsten
Titanium
Chemical analysis
Isotopes
Refractory materials
titanium
silicon

Cite this

de Meijer, R. ; Anisichkin, V.F. ; van Westrenen, W. / Forming the Moon for terrestrial silicate-rich material. In: Chemical Geology. 2013 ; No. 345. pp. 40-49.
@article{30f3c67288b843b0ad905b399d4570fe,
title = "Forming the Moon for terrestrial silicate-rich material",
abstract = "Recent high-precision measurements of the isotopic composition of lunar rocks demonstrate that the bulk silicate Earth and the Moon show an unexpectedly high degree of similarity. This is inconsistent with one of the primary results of classic dynamical simulations of the widely accepted giant impact model for the formation of the Moon, namely that most of the mass of the Moon originates from the impactor, not Earth.Resolution of this discrepancy without changing the main premises of the giant impact model requires total isotopic homogenisation of Earth and impactor material after the impact for a wide range of elements including oxygen, silicon, potassium, titanium, neodymium, and tungsten. Isotopic exchange between partially molten and vaporised Earth and Moon shortly after the impact has been invoked to explain the identical oxygen isotopic composition of Moon and Earth but the effectiveness and dynamics of this process are contested. Even if this process could explain the O isotope similarity, it is unlikely to work for the much heavier, refractory elements. Given the increasing uncertainty surrounding the giant impact model in light of these geochemical data, alternative hypotheses for lunar formation should be explored.In this paper, we revisit the hypothesis that the Moon was formed directly from terrestrial mantle material, as first proposed in the 'fission' hypothesis (Darwin, 1879. On the bodily tides of viscous and semi-elastic spheroids, and on the ocean tides upon a yielding nucleus. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 170, 1-35). We show that the dynamics of this scenario requires on the order of 10",
author = "{de Meijer}, R. and V.F. Anisichkin and {van Westrenen}, W.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.12.015",
language = "English",
pages = "40--49",
journal = "Chemical Geology",
issn = "0009-2541",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "345",

}

Forming the Moon for terrestrial silicate-rich material. / de Meijer, R.; Anisichkin, V.F.; van Westrenen, W.

In: Chemical Geology, No. 345, 2013, p. 40-49.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forming the Moon for terrestrial silicate-rich material

AU - de Meijer, R.

AU - Anisichkin, V.F.

AU - van Westrenen, W.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Recent high-precision measurements of the isotopic composition of lunar rocks demonstrate that the bulk silicate Earth and the Moon show an unexpectedly high degree of similarity. This is inconsistent with one of the primary results of classic dynamical simulations of the widely accepted giant impact model for the formation of the Moon, namely that most of the mass of the Moon originates from the impactor, not Earth.Resolution of this discrepancy without changing the main premises of the giant impact model requires total isotopic homogenisation of Earth and impactor material after the impact for a wide range of elements including oxygen, silicon, potassium, titanium, neodymium, and tungsten. Isotopic exchange between partially molten and vaporised Earth and Moon shortly after the impact has been invoked to explain the identical oxygen isotopic composition of Moon and Earth but the effectiveness and dynamics of this process are contested. Even if this process could explain the O isotope similarity, it is unlikely to work for the much heavier, refractory elements. Given the increasing uncertainty surrounding the giant impact model in light of these geochemical data, alternative hypotheses for lunar formation should be explored.In this paper, we revisit the hypothesis that the Moon was formed directly from terrestrial mantle material, as first proposed in the 'fission' hypothesis (Darwin, 1879. On the bodily tides of viscous and semi-elastic spheroids, and on the ocean tides upon a yielding nucleus. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 170, 1-35). We show that the dynamics of this scenario requires on the order of 10

AB - Recent high-precision measurements of the isotopic composition of lunar rocks demonstrate that the bulk silicate Earth and the Moon show an unexpectedly high degree of similarity. This is inconsistent with one of the primary results of classic dynamical simulations of the widely accepted giant impact model for the formation of the Moon, namely that most of the mass of the Moon originates from the impactor, not Earth.Resolution of this discrepancy without changing the main premises of the giant impact model requires total isotopic homogenisation of Earth and impactor material after the impact for a wide range of elements including oxygen, silicon, potassium, titanium, neodymium, and tungsten. Isotopic exchange between partially molten and vaporised Earth and Moon shortly after the impact has been invoked to explain the identical oxygen isotopic composition of Moon and Earth but the effectiveness and dynamics of this process are contested. Even if this process could explain the O isotope similarity, it is unlikely to work for the much heavier, refractory elements. Given the increasing uncertainty surrounding the giant impact model in light of these geochemical data, alternative hypotheses for lunar formation should be explored.In this paper, we revisit the hypothesis that the Moon was formed directly from terrestrial mantle material, as first proposed in the 'fission' hypothesis (Darwin, 1879. On the bodily tides of viscous and semi-elastic spheroids, and on the ocean tides upon a yielding nucleus. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 170, 1-35). We show that the dynamics of this scenario requires on the order of 10

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.12.015

DO - 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.12.015

M3 - Article

SP - 40

EP - 49

JO - Chemical Geology

JF - Chemical Geology

SN - 0009-2541

IS - 345

ER -