Fossil fuel divestment and climate change: Reviewing contested arguments

Sibylle Braungardt, Jeroen van den Bergh, Tessa Dunlop

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The strategy of fossil fuel divestment has attracted considerable attention in recent years, particularly in the press and social media. Spearheaded as a movement based on ethical principles, divestment has been suggested to play a potential role in shaping public opinion and policymaking on climate change. The growing size of the movement has prompted debate about the extent of its impact on fossil fuel companies and climate change mitigation efforts. This article investigates the potential effectiveness of the divestment movement according to the end goal of climate campaigners – to bring about a complete break from fossil fuels. We collect and qualify the key arguments as found mainly in the informal debate, and to a lesser extent in the academic literature. This will help readers to make an informed judgement that can contribute to a constructive debate about the effectiveness of divestment. We organize the literature into arguments for and against divestment, and explain how these relate to each other. In addition, we derive suggestions for further research on divestment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-200
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume50
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Fossil fuels
Climate change
climate change
social media
public opinion
climate
literature
Industry

Keywords

  • Carbon bubble
  • Divestment
  • Fossil-free
  • Green finance
  • Stranded carbon

Cite this

@article{291d396f206d418389d7221102cd23f1,
title = "Fossil fuel divestment and climate change: Reviewing contested arguments",
abstract = "The strategy of fossil fuel divestment has attracted considerable attention in recent years, particularly in the press and social media. Spearheaded as a movement based on ethical principles, divestment has been suggested to play a potential role in shaping public opinion and policymaking on climate change. The growing size of the movement has prompted debate about the extent of its impact on fossil fuel companies and climate change mitigation efforts. This article investigates the potential effectiveness of the divestment movement according to the end goal of climate campaigners – to bring about a complete break from fossil fuels. We collect and qualify the key arguments as found mainly in the informal debate, and to a lesser extent in the academic literature. This will help readers to make an informed judgement that can contribute to a constructive debate about the effectiveness of divestment. We organize the literature into arguments for and against divestment, and explain how these relate to each other. In addition, we derive suggestions for further research on divestment.",
keywords = "Carbon bubble, Divestment, Fossil-free, Green finance, Stranded carbon",
author = "Sibylle Braungardt and {van den Bergh}, Jeroen and Tessa Dunlop",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.004",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "191--200",
journal = "Energy Research & Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Fossil fuel divestment and climate change : Reviewing contested arguments. / Braungardt, Sibylle; van den Bergh, Jeroen; Dunlop, Tessa.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 50, 04.2019, p. 191-200.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fossil fuel divestment and climate change

T2 - Reviewing contested arguments

AU - Braungardt, Sibylle

AU - van den Bergh, Jeroen

AU - Dunlop, Tessa

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - The strategy of fossil fuel divestment has attracted considerable attention in recent years, particularly in the press and social media. Spearheaded as a movement based on ethical principles, divestment has been suggested to play a potential role in shaping public opinion and policymaking on climate change. The growing size of the movement has prompted debate about the extent of its impact on fossil fuel companies and climate change mitigation efforts. This article investigates the potential effectiveness of the divestment movement according to the end goal of climate campaigners – to bring about a complete break from fossil fuels. We collect and qualify the key arguments as found mainly in the informal debate, and to a lesser extent in the academic literature. This will help readers to make an informed judgement that can contribute to a constructive debate about the effectiveness of divestment. We organize the literature into arguments for and against divestment, and explain how these relate to each other. In addition, we derive suggestions for further research on divestment.

AB - The strategy of fossil fuel divestment has attracted considerable attention in recent years, particularly in the press and social media. Spearheaded as a movement based on ethical principles, divestment has been suggested to play a potential role in shaping public opinion and policymaking on climate change. The growing size of the movement has prompted debate about the extent of its impact on fossil fuel companies and climate change mitigation efforts. This article investigates the potential effectiveness of the divestment movement according to the end goal of climate campaigners – to bring about a complete break from fossil fuels. We collect and qualify the key arguments as found mainly in the informal debate, and to a lesser extent in the academic literature. This will help readers to make an informed judgement that can contribute to a constructive debate about the effectiveness of divestment. We organize the literature into arguments for and against divestment, and explain how these relate to each other. In addition, we derive suggestions for further research on divestment.

KW - Carbon bubble

KW - Divestment

KW - Fossil-free

KW - Green finance

KW - Stranded carbon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059167790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059167790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.004

M3 - Review article

VL - 50

SP - 191

EP - 200

JO - Energy Research & Social Science

JF - Energy Research & Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -