Abstract
Explainable methods have received increased attention within artificial intelligence. Wherever an automated system makes a decision an explanation is required to convince a user about the decision. Furthermore, online information quality assessment is crucial to help users navigate information. However, explaining the assessment of online information had not been clarified well. The current work provides explanations to a user about the assessment of online information and specific, provides explanations for the quality assessments of online reviews. We construct an abstract argumentation framework (AF) based on a set of given reviews. We consider the grounded semantics of AFs to assess each topic. Then, we discuss the question of why a score can be assigned to a topic of a product. Furthermore, we indicate a proper score of a review based on the scores of topics within the review in question. We also collect arguments that can support the chosen score of a review.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | ArgXAI 2022 Argumentation for eXplainable AI |
| Subtitle of host publication | 1st International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI, co-located with 9th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2022) Cardiff, Wales, September 12, 2022 |
| Editors | K. Cyras, T. Kampik, O. Cocarascu, A. Rago |
| Publisher | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 1st International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI, ArgXAI 2022 - Cardiff, United Kingdom Duration: 12 Sept 2022 → … |
Publication series
| Name | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
|---|---|
| Publisher | CEUR-WS |
| Volume | 3209 |
| ISSN (Print) | 1613-0073 |
Conference
| Conference | 1st International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI, ArgXAI 2022 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Cardiff |
| Period | 12/09/22 → … |
Funding
This research has been supported by the Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) and Supported by the Netherlands eScience Center project “The Eye of the Beholder” (project nr. 027.020.15). Acknowledgments This research has been supported by the Centrum Wiskunde & Informat-ica (CWI) and Supported by the Netherlands eScience Center project “The Eye of the Beholder” (project nr. 027.020.15).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Centrum Wiskunde & Informat-ica | |
| Centrum Wiskunde and Informatica | 027.020.15 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fostering Explainable Online Review Assessment Through Computational Argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver