Foul or dive? Motor contributions to judging ambiguous foul situations in football

P.G. Renden, S. Kerstens, R.R.D. Oudejans, R. Canal Bruland

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Football (soccer) referees frequently face situations in which they have to distinguish dives and fouls. Yet, little is known about the contributing factors that characterise the ability to judge these ambiguous situations correctly. To this end, in the current article we tested the hypothesis that motor experience of observers contributes to the visual identification of deceptive actions. Thereto, we asked skilled football referees, skilled football players, wheelchair bounded football fans (thus with limited motor experience) and novices to judge whether potential tackle situations in football were either fouls or dives. Results revealed that the referees (accuracy 72.2%, s=6.2) and players (accuracy 72.0%, s=6.4) were better at discriminating fouls and dives than the fans (accuracy 61.1%, s=7.2) and the novices (accuracy 57.4%, s=7.0) (P < 0.001). The results seem to point to an added value of motor experience in detecting deceptive movements. © 2014 Copyright European College of Sport Science.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)S221-S227
    JournalEuropean Journal of Sport Science
    Volume14
    Issue numberS1
    Early online date31 May 2012
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Football
    Soccer
    Wheelchairs

    Cite this

    Renden, P.G. ; Kerstens, S. ; Oudejans, R.R.D. ; Canal Bruland, R. / Foul or dive? Motor contributions to judging ambiguous foul situations in football. In: European Journal of Sport Science. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. S1. pp. S221-S227.
    @article{a1205fd7a2e84030a34bebe33d021dcf,
    title = "Foul or dive? Motor contributions to judging ambiguous foul situations in football",
    abstract = "Football (soccer) referees frequently face situations in which they have to distinguish dives and fouls. Yet, little is known about the contributing factors that characterise the ability to judge these ambiguous situations correctly. To this end, in the current article we tested the hypothesis that motor experience of observers contributes to the visual identification of deceptive actions. Thereto, we asked skilled football referees, skilled football players, wheelchair bounded football fans (thus with limited motor experience) and novices to judge whether potential tackle situations in football were either fouls or dives. Results revealed that the referees (accuracy 72.2{\%}, s=6.2) and players (accuracy 72.0{\%}, s=6.4) were better at discriminating fouls and dives than the fans (accuracy 61.1{\%}, s=7.2) and the novices (accuracy 57.4{\%}, s=7.0) (P < 0.001). The results seem to point to an added value of motor experience in detecting deceptive movements. {\circledC} 2014 Copyright European College of Sport Science.",
    author = "P.G. Renden and S. Kerstens and R.R.D. Oudejans and {Canal Bruland}, R.",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/17461391.2012.683813",
    language = "English",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "S221--S227",
    journal = "European Journal of Sport Science",
    issn = "1746-1391",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
    number = "S1",

    }

    Foul or dive? Motor contributions to judging ambiguous foul situations in football. / Renden, P.G.; Kerstens, S.; Oudejans, R.R.D.; Canal Bruland, R.

    In: European Journal of Sport Science, Vol. 14, No. S1, 2014, p. S221-S227.

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Foul or dive? Motor contributions to judging ambiguous foul situations in football

    AU - Renden, P.G.

    AU - Kerstens, S.

    AU - Oudejans, R.R.D.

    AU - Canal Bruland, R.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Football (soccer) referees frequently face situations in which they have to distinguish dives and fouls. Yet, little is known about the contributing factors that characterise the ability to judge these ambiguous situations correctly. To this end, in the current article we tested the hypothesis that motor experience of observers contributes to the visual identification of deceptive actions. Thereto, we asked skilled football referees, skilled football players, wheelchair bounded football fans (thus with limited motor experience) and novices to judge whether potential tackle situations in football were either fouls or dives. Results revealed that the referees (accuracy 72.2%, s=6.2) and players (accuracy 72.0%, s=6.4) were better at discriminating fouls and dives than the fans (accuracy 61.1%, s=7.2) and the novices (accuracy 57.4%, s=7.0) (P < 0.001). The results seem to point to an added value of motor experience in detecting deceptive movements. © 2014 Copyright European College of Sport Science.

    AB - Football (soccer) referees frequently face situations in which they have to distinguish dives and fouls. Yet, little is known about the contributing factors that characterise the ability to judge these ambiguous situations correctly. To this end, in the current article we tested the hypothesis that motor experience of observers contributes to the visual identification of deceptive actions. Thereto, we asked skilled football referees, skilled football players, wheelchair bounded football fans (thus with limited motor experience) and novices to judge whether potential tackle situations in football were either fouls or dives. Results revealed that the referees (accuracy 72.2%, s=6.2) and players (accuracy 72.0%, s=6.4) were better at discriminating fouls and dives than the fans (accuracy 61.1%, s=7.2) and the novices (accuracy 57.4%, s=7.0) (P < 0.001). The results seem to point to an added value of motor experience in detecting deceptive movements. © 2014 Copyright European College of Sport Science.

    U2 - 10.1080/17461391.2012.683813

    DO - 10.1080/17461391.2012.683813

    M3 - Article

    VL - 14

    SP - S221-S227

    JO - European Journal of Sport Science

    JF - European Journal of Sport Science

    SN - 1746-1391

    IS - S1

    ER -