Fragmented but forceful: Dutch administrative sciences and their institutional evolution

M. Noordegraaf, T. Brandsen, D. Huitema

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article is an attempt by three (relatively) young scholars to make sense of the broad field of public administration (PA), in The Netherlands, with particular emphasis on Dutch administrative sciences. The one essential fact about the Dutch administrative sciences is that they lack a real essence, both in institutional and in paradigmatic terms. They are fragmented - yet forceful. Nevertheless, we will argue, they must recast their position in relation to practitioners and other academics if they are to maintain their strength. We start by highlighting the development of The Netherlands itself, moving on to Dutch public administration and Dutch administrative sciences. We explore the historical Dutch emphasis on 'pragmatic morality'. After this rough historical overview, we move on to contemporary features of Dutch administrative sciences, features which explain why these sciences have become fragmented, yet forceful - as well as why this force is threatened. We conclude with a perspective on the future of the field and will argue in favour of a renewed emphasis on 'pragmatic morality' within scholarly circles. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2006.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-1006
Number of pages18
JournalPublic Administration
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fragmented but forceful: Dutch administrative sciences and their institutional evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this