Frame Reflection Lab: a Playful Method for Frame Reflection on Synthetic Biology

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Synthetic biology is an emerging technology that asks for inclusive reflection on how people frame the field. To unravel how we can facilitate such reflection, this study evaluates the Frame Reflection Lab (FRL). Building upon playfulness design principles, the FRL comprises a workshop with video-narratives and co-creative group exercises. We studied how the FRL facilitated frame reflection by organizing workshops with various student groups. Analysis of 12 group conversations and 158 mini-exit surveys yielded patterns in first-order reflection (problem analysis and solution finding in reflection on the development of synthetic biology as a field) as well as patterns in second-order reflection (reflection on values and assumptions underlying the first-order reflection). Also patterns in participants’ (re)framing of synthetic biology could be induced; participants’ viewpoints converged to some extent, yet with openness to individual viewpoint differences. Although the FRL method fortified the reflection processes of participants, the narratives and the workshop’s flexible format could inhibit the reflection too. Therefore, we advise designers of future frame reflection methods to apply stronger conversational facilitation and narratives of slightly mysterious yet identifiable narrators, in case e.g. video-narratives are created and used to scaffold the reflection process. Nevertheless, we argue that the use of a playful frame reflection method like the FRL could function well as (1) a step to precede more application-specific deliberation or decision-making on synthetic biology and as (2) a method for the collection of contemporary citizen viewpoints plus rationales underlying these, for the further (societally) responsible development of the emerging field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-172
Number of pages18
JournalNanoEthics
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

biology
narrative
video
Group
deliberation
conversation
citizen
decision making
Synthetic Biology
Values
student
Technical presentations
Scaffolds

Keywords

  • Frame reflection
  • Playful tools
  • Reflection methods
  • Responsible research and innovation
  • Synthetic biology
  • Video-narratives

Cite this

@article{7a1a1855592141cdae1709588ec31662,
title = "Frame Reflection Lab: a Playful Method for Frame Reflection on Synthetic Biology",
abstract = "Synthetic biology is an emerging technology that asks for inclusive reflection on how people frame the field. To unravel how we can facilitate such reflection, this study evaluates the Frame Reflection Lab (FRL). Building upon playfulness design principles, the FRL comprises a workshop with video-narratives and co-creative group exercises. We studied how the FRL facilitated frame reflection by organizing workshops with various student groups. Analysis of 12 group conversations and 158 mini-exit surveys yielded patterns in first-order reflection (problem analysis and solution finding in reflection on the development of synthetic biology as a field) as well as patterns in second-order reflection (reflection on values and assumptions underlying the first-order reflection). Also patterns in participants’ (re)framing of synthetic biology could be induced; participants’ viewpoints converged to some extent, yet with openness to individual viewpoint differences. Although the FRL method fortified the reflection processes of participants, the narratives and the workshop’s flexible format could inhibit the reflection too. Therefore, we advise designers of future frame reflection methods to apply stronger conversational facilitation and narratives of slightly mysterious yet identifiable narrators, in case e.g. video-narratives are created and used to scaffold the reflection process. Nevertheless, we argue that the use of a playful frame reflection method like the FRL could function well as (1) a step to precede more application-specific deliberation or decision-making on synthetic biology and as (2) a method for the collection of contemporary citizen viewpoints plus rationales underlying these, for the further (societally) responsible development of the emerging field.",
keywords = "Frame reflection, Playful tools, Reflection methods, Responsible research and innovation, Synthetic biology, Video-narratives",
author = "{van der Meij}, {Marjoleine G.} and Heltzel, {Anouk A.L.M.} and Broerse, {Jacqueline E.W.} and Frank Kupper",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11569-018-0318-9",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "155--172",
journal = "NanoEthics",
issn = "1871-4757",
publisher = "Springer_Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Frame Reflection Lab : a Playful Method for Frame Reflection on Synthetic Biology. / van der Meij, Marjoleine G.; Heltzel, Anouk A.L.M.; Broerse, Jacqueline E.W.; Kupper, Frank.

In: NanoEthics, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.08.2018, p. 155-172.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frame Reflection Lab

T2 - a Playful Method for Frame Reflection on Synthetic Biology

AU - van der Meij, Marjoleine G.

AU - Heltzel, Anouk A.L.M.

AU - Broerse, Jacqueline E.W.

AU - Kupper, Frank

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Synthetic biology is an emerging technology that asks for inclusive reflection on how people frame the field. To unravel how we can facilitate such reflection, this study evaluates the Frame Reflection Lab (FRL). Building upon playfulness design principles, the FRL comprises a workshop with video-narratives and co-creative group exercises. We studied how the FRL facilitated frame reflection by organizing workshops with various student groups. Analysis of 12 group conversations and 158 mini-exit surveys yielded patterns in first-order reflection (problem analysis and solution finding in reflection on the development of synthetic biology as a field) as well as patterns in second-order reflection (reflection on values and assumptions underlying the first-order reflection). Also patterns in participants’ (re)framing of synthetic biology could be induced; participants’ viewpoints converged to some extent, yet with openness to individual viewpoint differences. Although the FRL method fortified the reflection processes of participants, the narratives and the workshop’s flexible format could inhibit the reflection too. Therefore, we advise designers of future frame reflection methods to apply stronger conversational facilitation and narratives of slightly mysterious yet identifiable narrators, in case e.g. video-narratives are created and used to scaffold the reflection process. Nevertheless, we argue that the use of a playful frame reflection method like the FRL could function well as (1) a step to precede more application-specific deliberation or decision-making on synthetic biology and as (2) a method for the collection of contemporary citizen viewpoints plus rationales underlying these, for the further (societally) responsible development of the emerging field.

AB - Synthetic biology is an emerging technology that asks for inclusive reflection on how people frame the field. To unravel how we can facilitate such reflection, this study evaluates the Frame Reflection Lab (FRL). Building upon playfulness design principles, the FRL comprises a workshop with video-narratives and co-creative group exercises. We studied how the FRL facilitated frame reflection by organizing workshops with various student groups. Analysis of 12 group conversations and 158 mini-exit surveys yielded patterns in first-order reflection (problem analysis and solution finding in reflection on the development of synthetic biology as a field) as well as patterns in second-order reflection (reflection on values and assumptions underlying the first-order reflection). Also patterns in participants’ (re)framing of synthetic biology could be induced; participants’ viewpoints converged to some extent, yet with openness to individual viewpoint differences. Although the FRL method fortified the reflection processes of participants, the narratives and the workshop’s flexible format could inhibit the reflection too. Therefore, we advise designers of future frame reflection methods to apply stronger conversational facilitation and narratives of slightly mysterious yet identifiable narrators, in case e.g. video-narratives are created and used to scaffold the reflection process. Nevertheless, we argue that the use of a playful frame reflection method like the FRL could function well as (1) a step to precede more application-specific deliberation or decision-making on synthetic biology and as (2) a method for the collection of contemporary citizen viewpoints plus rationales underlying these, for the further (societally) responsible development of the emerging field.

KW - Frame reflection

KW - Playful tools

KW - Reflection methods

KW - Responsible research and innovation

KW - Synthetic biology

KW - Video-narratives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048362001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048362001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11569-018-0318-9

DO - 10.1007/s11569-018-0318-9

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 155

EP - 172

JO - NanoEthics

JF - NanoEthics

SN - 1871-4757

IS - 2

ER -