TY - CHAP
T1 - Frames of the field
T2 - Ethnography as photography
AU - Vesa, Mikko
AU - Krohn, Mikaela Hanna Maria
AU - den Hond, Frank
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This chapter uses photography as an analogy to ethnography in order to focus attention on the recording of research materials during ethnographic fieldwork. Photographic pictures are not unproblematic representations of the ‘world out there’, as has long been acknowledged by John Berger, Susan Sontag, Vilém Flusser, Ariella Azoulay, and other writers on photography. The camera – an apparatus – enables and constrains the photographer in recording a situation to produce technical images, information-rich surfaces. Photographic pictures are framed in multiple ways. Likewise, as ethnographic research materials are recorded with the apparatus of ethnographic methods, all observational field notes, interviews and visual objects are inherently framed at the very moment of their inception, not only in the sense of them being socially constructed, but also in a technical sense, which is independent from the subjectivity of the ethnographer. This latter framing is likely to affect the post-fieldwork reading of research materials. Through this analogy, the chapter highlights an under-explored dimension of ethnography, namely how the production of ethnographic data may contribute to a misplaced belief in the facticity of ethnography. It thus explores what can be learned from the analogy with photography for understanding ethnographic data, the ethnographer, ethnographic method, research participants, and the public use of ethnography; it is an invitation to reflect on the framing of research materials in ethnographic fieldwork.
AB - This chapter uses photography as an analogy to ethnography in order to focus attention on the recording of research materials during ethnographic fieldwork. Photographic pictures are not unproblematic representations of the ‘world out there’, as has long been acknowledged by John Berger, Susan Sontag, Vilém Flusser, Ariella Azoulay, and other writers on photography. The camera – an apparatus – enables and constrains the photographer in recording a situation to produce technical images, information-rich surfaces. Photographic pictures are framed in multiple ways. Likewise, as ethnographic research materials are recorded with the apparatus of ethnographic methods, all observational field notes, interviews and visual objects are inherently framed at the very moment of their inception, not only in the sense of them being socially constructed, but also in a technical sense, which is independent from the subjectivity of the ethnographer. This latter framing is likely to affect the post-fieldwork reading of research materials. Through this analogy, the chapter highlights an under-explored dimension of ethnography, namely how the production of ethnographic data may contribute to a misplaced belief in the facticity of ethnography. It thus explores what can be learned from the analogy with photography for understanding ethnographic data, the ethnographer, ethnographic method, research participants, and the public use of ethnography; it is an invitation to reflect on the framing of research materials in ethnographic fieldwork.
KW - 512 Business and Management
KW - Methodology
KW - Data Collection
KW - Apparatus
UR - https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-Anthropology-and-Business/Mir-Fayard/p/book/9781138496422
U2 - 10.4324/9781003052456-5
DO - 10.4324/9781003052456-5
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781138496422
SN - 9780367511388
T3 - Routledge Companions in Business, Management and Accounting
SP - 80
EP - 100
BT - The Routledge Companion to Anthropology and Business
A2 - Mir, Raza
A2 - Fayard, Anne-Laure
PB - Routledge
ER -