Frank Ankersmit and Hayden White on the politics of historical representation

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We do not learn from the past nor from possible analogies between the past and the present. Rather we learn from representations of the past and the insights they offer, for those insights allow us to adopt the political and moral values that we need to plan a future course of action. It follows, so Frank Ankersmit argues, that aesthetics in its sense as a general theory of representation precedes ethics. This essay is concerned with this bold and important thesis. It will do so in the context of the politics of historical representation and the fact-value and subjectivity-objectivity distinctions. The subject was also dear to the heart of Ankersmit's late American colleague Hayden White. Ankersmit is concerned with how historical representations support a future course of action. White, by contrast, was (also) concerned with how historical representations limit a future course of action since they cannot serve as a basis for utopian politics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-431
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of the Philosophy of History
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Hayden White
Historical Representation
Utopian
Objectivity
Political Values
Subjectivity
Aesthetics
General Theory
Moral Values

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • Frank Ankersmit
  • Hayden White
  • Historical representation
  • Subjectivity
  • The sublime
  • Utopianism
  • Values

Cite this

@article{5fdfa5fdd96e46f2a6b6a4d38e567304,
title = "Frank Ankersmit and Hayden White on the politics of historical representation",
abstract = "We do not learn from the past nor from possible analogies between the past and the present. Rather we learn from representations of the past and the insights they offer, for those insights allow us to adopt the political and moral values that we need to plan a future course of action. It follows, so Frank Ankersmit argues, that aesthetics in its sense as a general theory of representation precedes ethics. This essay is concerned with this bold and important thesis. It will do so in the context of the politics of historical representation and the fact-value and subjectivity-objectivity distinctions. The subject was also dear to the heart of Ankersmit's late American colleague Hayden White. Ankersmit is concerned with how historical representations support a future course of action. White, by contrast, was (also) concerned with how historical representations limit a future course of action since they cannot serve as a basis for utopian politics.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, Frank Ankersmit, Hayden White, Historical representation, Subjectivity, The sublime, Utopianism, Values",
author = "{Van Den Akker}, Chiel",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1163/18722636-12341405",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "410--431",
journal = "Journal of the Philosophy of History",
issn = "1872-261X",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "3",

}

Frank Ankersmit and Hayden White on the politics of historical representation. / Van Den Akker, Chiel.

In: Journal of the Philosophy of History, Vol. 12, No. 3, 28.11.2018, p. 410-431.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frank Ankersmit and Hayden White on the politics of historical representation

AU - Van Den Akker, Chiel

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - We do not learn from the past nor from possible analogies between the past and the present. Rather we learn from representations of the past and the insights they offer, for those insights allow us to adopt the political and moral values that we need to plan a future course of action. It follows, so Frank Ankersmit argues, that aesthetics in its sense as a general theory of representation precedes ethics. This essay is concerned with this bold and important thesis. It will do so in the context of the politics of historical representation and the fact-value and subjectivity-objectivity distinctions. The subject was also dear to the heart of Ankersmit's late American colleague Hayden White. Ankersmit is concerned with how historical representations support a future course of action. White, by contrast, was (also) concerned with how historical representations limit a future course of action since they cannot serve as a basis for utopian politics.

AB - We do not learn from the past nor from possible analogies between the past and the present. Rather we learn from representations of the past and the insights they offer, for those insights allow us to adopt the political and moral values that we need to plan a future course of action. It follows, so Frank Ankersmit argues, that aesthetics in its sense as a general theory of representation precedes ethics. This essay is concerned with this bold and important thesis. It will do so in the context of the politics of historical representation and the fact-value and subjectivity-objectivity distinctions. The subject was also dear to the heart of Ankersmit's late American colleague Hayden White. Ankersmit is concerned with how historical representations support a future course of action. White, by contrast, was (also) concerned with how historical representations limit a future course of action since they cannot serve as a basis for utopian politics.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Frank Ankersmit

KW - Hayden White

KW - Historical representation

KW - Subjectivity

KW - The sublime

KW - Utopianism

KW - Values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059367037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059367037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://brill.com/view/journals/jph/12/3/jph.12.issue-3.xml

U2 - 10.1163/18722636-12341405

DO - 10.1163/18722636-12341405

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 410

EP - 431

JO - Journal of the Philosophy of History

JF - Journal of the Philosophy of History

SN - 1872-261X

IS - 3

ER -