From Research to Practice: Which Research Strategy Contributes More to Clinical Excellence? Comparing High-Volume versus High-Quality Biomedical Research

A. Tchetchik, A. Grinstein, E. Manes, D. Shapira, R. Durst

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The question when and to what extent academic research can benefit society is of great interest to policy-makers and the academic community. Physicians in university hospitals represent a highly relevant test-group for studying the link between research and practice because they engage in biomedical academic research while also providing medical care of measurable quality. Physicians' research contribution to medical practice can be driven by either high-volume or high-quality research productivity, as often pursuing one productivity strategy excludes the other. To empirically examine the differential contribution to medical practice of the two strategies, we collected secondary data on departments across three specializations (Cardiology, Oncology and Orthopedics) in 50 U.S.-based university hospitals served by 4,330 physicians. Data on volume and quality of biomedical research at each department was correlated with publicly available ratings of departments' quality of care, demonstrating that high-quality research has significantly greater contribution to quality of care than high-volume research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e0129259
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

research planning
biomedical research
Biomedical Research
Quality of Health Care
Research
physicians
Physicians
Productivity
Cardiology
Administrative Personnel
orthopedics
Oncology
Orthopedics
Health care

Cite this

@article{1a6731ca8a7d46f090ca06aa99924210,
title = "From Research to Practice: Which Research Strategy Contributes More to Clinical Excellence? Comparing High-Volume versus High-Quality Biomedical Research",
abstract = "The question when and to what extent academic research can benefit society is of great interest to policy-makers and the academic community. Physicians in university hospitals represent a highly relevant test-group for studying the link between research and practice because they engage in biomedical academic research while also providing medical care of measurable quality. Physicians' research contribution to medical practice can be driven by either high-volume or high-quality research productivity, as often pursuing one productivity strategy excludes the other. To empirically examine the differential contribution to medical practice of the two strategies, we collected secondary data on departments across three specializations (Cardiology, Oncology and Orthopedics) in 50 U.S.-based university hospitals served by 4,330 physicians. Data on volume and quality of biomedical research at each department was correlated with publicly available ratings of departments' quality of care, demonstrating that high-quality research has significantly greater contribution to quality of care than high-volume research.",
author = "A. Tchetchik and A. Grinstein and E. Manes and D. Shapira and R. Durst",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0129259",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "e0129259",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

From Research to Practice: Which Research Strategy Contributes More to Clinical Excellence? Comparing High-Volume versus High-Quality Biomedical Research. / Tchetchik, A.; Grinstein, A.; Manes, E.; Shapira, D.; Durst, R.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2015, p. e0129259.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Research to Practice: Which Research Strategy Contributes More to Clinical Excellence? Comparing High-Volume versus High-Quality Biomedical Research

AU - Tchetchik, A.

AU - Grinstein, A.

AU - Manes, E.

AU - Shapira, D.

AU - Durst, R.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The question when and to what extent academic research can benefit society is of great interest to policy-makers and the academic community. Physicians in university hospitals represent a highly relevant test-group for studying the link between research and practice because they engage in biomedical academic research while also providing medical care of measurable quality. Physicians' research contribution to medical practice can be driven by either high-volume or high-quality research productivity, as often pursuing one productivity strategy excludes the other. To empirically examine the differential contribution to medical practice of the two strategies, we collected secondary data on departments across three specializations (Cardiology, Oncology and Orthopedics) in 50 U.S.-based university hospitals served by 4,330 physicians. Data on volume and quality of biomedical research at each department was correlated with publicly available ratings of departments' quality of care, demonstrating that high-quality research has significantly greater contribution to quality of care than high-volume research.

AB - The question when and to what extent academic research can benefit society is of great interest to policy-makers and the academic community. Physicians in university hospitals represent a highly relevant test-group for studying the link between research and practice because they engage in biomedical academic research while also providing medical care of measurable quality. Physicians' research contribution to medical practice can be driven by either high-volume or high-quality research productivity, as often pursuing one productivity strategy excludes the other. To empirically examine the differential contribution to medical practice of the two strategies, we collected secondary data on departments across three specializations (Cardiology, Oncology and Orthopedics) in 50 U.S.-based university hospitals served by 4,330 physicians. Data on volume and quality of biomedical research at each department was correlated with publicly available ratings of departments' quality of care, demonstrating that high-quality research has significantly greater contribution to quality of care than high-volume research.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0129259

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0129259

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - e0129259

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

ER -