Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis

Helias A. De Udo Haes, Reinout Heijungs, Gjalt Huppes, Ester Van Der Voet, Jean Paul Hettelingh

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Several tools exist for the analysis of the environmental impacts of chains or networks of processes. These relatively simple tools include materials flow accounting (MFA), substance flow analysis (SFA), life-cycle assessment (LCA), energy analysis, and environmentally extended input-output analysis (IOA), all based on fixed input-output relations. They are characterized by the nature of their flow objects, such as products, materials, energy, substances, or money flows, and by their spatial and temporal characteristics. These characteristics are insufficient for their methodological characterization, and sometimes lead to inappropriate use. More clarity is desirable, both for clearer guidance of applications and for a more consistent methodology development. In addition to the nature of the flow object and to spatial and temporal characteristics, another key feature concerns the way in which processes are included in a system to be analyzed. The inclusion of processes can be done in two fundamentally different ways: according to a full mode of analysis, with the inclusion of all flows and related processes to their full extent as present in a region in a specific period of time; and according to an attribution mode, taking processes into account insofar as these are required for a given social demand, function, or activity, in principle whenever and wherever these processes take place. This distinction, which cuts across families of tools that traditionally belong together, appears to have significant methodological and practical implications. Thus the distinction between the two modes of analysis, however crucial it may be, strengthens the idea of one coherent family of tools for environmental systems analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-56
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
Volume4
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

attribution
life cycle analysis
input-output analysis
inclusion
energy
life cycle assessment
systems analysis
environmental impact
environmental analysis
money
methodology
analysis
present
demand
family

Keywords

  • Attribution
  • Energy analysis
  • Input-output analysis (IOA)
  • Life-cycle assessment (LCA)
  • Materials flow accounting (MFA)
  • Substance flow analysis (SFA)

Cite this

De Udo Haes, H. A., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Van Der Voet, E., & Hettelingh, J. P. (2000). Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(1), 45-56.
De Udo Haes, Helias A. ; Heijungs, Reinout ; Huppes, Gjalt ; Van Der Voet, Ester ; Hettelingh, Jean Paul. / Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis. In: Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2000 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 45-56.
@article{132549a91a814f0d9ede307a472ab44b,
title = "Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis",
abstract = "Several tools exist for the analysis of the environmental impacts of chains or networks of processes. These relatively simple tools include materials flow accounting (MFA), substance flow analysis (SFA), life-cycle assessment (LCA), energy analysis, and environmentally extended input-output analysis (IOA), all based on fixed input-output relations. They are characterized by the nature of their flow objects, such as products, materials, energy, substances, or money flows, and by their spatial and temporal characteristics. These characteristics are insufficient for their methodological characterization, and sometimes lead to inappropriate use. More clarity is desirable, both for clearer guidance of applications and for a more consistent methodology development. In addition to the nature of the flow object and to spatial and temporal characteristics, another key feature concerns the way in which processes are included in a system to be analyzed. The inclusion of processes can be done in two fundamentally different ways: according to a full mode of analysis, with the inclusion of all flows and related processes to their full extent as present in a region in a specific period of time; and according to an attribution mode, taking processes into account insofar as these are required for a given social demand, function, or activity, in principle whenever and wherever these processes take place. This distinction, which cuts across families of tools that traditionally belong together, appears to have significant methodological and practical implications. Thus the distinction between the two modes of analysis, however crucial it may be, strengthens the idea of one coherent family of tools for environmental systems analysis.",
keywords = "Attribution, Energy analysis, Input-output analysis (IOA), Life-cycle assessment (LCA), Materials flow accounting (MFA), Substance flow analysis (SFA)",
author = "{De Udo Haes}, {Helias A.} and Reinout Heijungs and Gjalt Huppes and {Van Der Voet}, Ester and Hettelingh, {Jean Paul}",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "45--56",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Ecology",
issn = "1088-1980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

De Udo Haes, HA, Heijungs, R, Huppes, G, Van Der Voet, E & Hettelingh, JP 2000, 'Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis' Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45-56.

Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis. / De Udo Haes, Helias A.; Heijungs, Reinout; Huppes, Gjalt; Van Der Voet, Ester; Hettelingh, Jean Paul.

In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2000, p. 45-56.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis

AU - De Udo Haes, Helias A.

AU - Heijungs, Reinout

AU - Huppes, Gjalt

AU - Van Der Voet, Ester

AU - Hettelingh, Jean Paul

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Several tools exist for the analysis of the environmental impacts of chains or networks of processes. These relatively simple tools include materials flow accounting (MFA), substance flow analysis (SFA), life-cycle assessment (LCA), energy analysis, and environmentally extended input-output analysis (IOA), all based on fixed input-output relations. They are characterized by the nature of their flow objects, such as products, materials, energy, substances, or money flows, and by their spatial and temporal characteristics. These characteristics are insufficient for their methodological characterization, and sometimes lead to inappropriate use. More clarity is desirable, both for clearer guidance of applications and for a more consistent methodology development. In addition to the nature of the flow object and to spatial and temporal characteristics, another key feature concerns the way in which processes are included in a system to be analyzed. The inclusion of processes can be done in two fundamentally different ways: according to a full mode of analysis, with the inclusion of all flows and related processes to their full extent as present in a region in a specific period of time; and according to an attribution mode, taking processes into account insofar as these are required for a given social demand, function, or activity, in principle whenever and wherever these processes take place. This distinction, which cuts across families of tools that traditionally belong together, appears to have significant methodological and practical implications. Thus the distinction between the two modes of analysis, however crucial it may be, strengthens the idea of one coherent family of tools for environmental systems analysis.

AB - Several tools exist for the analysis of the environmental impacts of chains or networks of processes. These relatively simple tools include materials flow accounting (MFA), substance flow analysis (SFA), life-cycle assessment (LCA), energy analysis, and environmentally extended input-output analysis (IOA), all based on fixed input-output relations. They are characterized by the nature of their flow objects, such as products, materials, energy, substances, or money flows, and by their spatial and temporal characteristics. These characteristics are insufficient for their methodological characterization, and sometimes lead to inappropriate use. More clarity is desirable, both for clearer guidance of applications and for a more consistent methodology development. In addition to the nature of the flow object and to spatial and temporal characteristics, another key feature concerns the way in which processes are included in a system to be analyzed. The inclusion of processes can be done in two fundamentally different ways: according to a full mode of analysis, with the inclusion of all flows and related processes to their full extent as present in a region in a specific period of time; and according to an attribution mode, taking processes into account insofar as these are required for a given social demand, function, or activity, in principle whenever and wherever these processes take place. This distinction, which cuts across families of tools that traditionally belong together, appears to have significant methodological and practical implications. Thus the distinction between the two modes of analysis, however crucial it may be, strengthens the idea of one coherent family of tools for environmental systems analysis.

KW - Attribution

KW - Energy analysis

KW - Input-output analysis (IOA)

KW - Life-cycle assessment (LCA)

KW - Materials flow accounting (MFA)

KW - Substance flow analysis (SFA)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033673115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033673115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 4

SP - 45

EP - 56

JO - Journal of Industrial Ecology

JF - Journal of Industrial Ecology

SN - 1088-1980

IS - 1

ER -

De Udo Haes HA, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Van Der Voet E, Hettelingh JP. Full mode and attribution mode in environmental analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2000;4(1):45-56.