Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Furthering the Dialogue between Religious Studies and Theology: An Apophatic Approach as a Heuristic Tool for Methodological Agnosticism

  • Katya Tolstaya*
  • , Frank Bestebreurtje
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    549 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Debates on the relation between theology and religious studies ultimately revolve around epistemological questions: What are the respective limits of religious and academic knowledge and reasoning, and along what boundaries can they meet? This contribution argues that the "reality of religion" is the shared subject matter of these disciplines. For methodological purposes, a distinction is made between two poles: the "transcendent frame" of theology, which defines the reality of religion with reference to transcendence, and the "immanent frame" of religious studies, which defines the reality of religion with reference to the empirical or immanent and in which transcendence is "bracketed." A qualified methodological agnosticism that considers the bounds of knowledge can further the dialogue between theology and religious studies on the status of transcendence. The theological apophatic method, which departs from a sense of not-knowing and the limits of human knowledge, can serve as a heuristic tool.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)469-505
    Number of pages37
    JournalJAAR : Journal of the American Academy of Religion
    Volume89
    Issue number2
    Early online date23 Jun 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2021 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

    Copyright:
    Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Furthering the Dialogue between Religious Studies and Theology: An Apophatic Approach as a Heuristic Tool for Methodological Agnosticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this