Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism

Carmen Olsen, Anna Gold

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Drawing on the literature from cognitive neuroscience and auditing research on professional skepticism (PS), this paper identifies new research questions, determinants, and theories that may resolve current problem areas in PS research. We identify the following PS research areas that neuroscientific perspectives can potentially improve: 1) theory, 2) trust, 3) trait and state skepticism, 4) deception/fraud detection, and 5) skeptical judgment and action. The paper concludes with a discussion of the critical question of whether integrating a neuroscientific perspective in PS research is worthwhile and provides further direction for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-141
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Accounting Literature
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Professional skepticism
Research directions
Auditors
Neuroscience
Fraud detection
Skepticism
Auditing
Deception

Keywords

  • Auditors’ professional skepticism
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Fraud detection
  • Skeptical judgment and action
  • Trait and state skepticism
  • Trust

Cite this

@article{3057d03f62b4499ca2787c5b76f6c570,
title = "Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism",
abstract = "Drawing on the literature from cognitive neuroscience and auditing research on professional skepticism (PS), this paper identifies new research questions, determinants, and theories that may resolve current problem areas in PS research. We identify the following PS research areas that neuroscientific perspectives can potentially improve: 1) theory, 2) trust, 3) trait and state skepticism, 4) deception/fraud detection, and 5) skeptical judgment and action. The paper concludes with a discussion of the critical question of whether integrating a neuroscientific perspective in PS research is worthwhile and provides further direction for future research.",
keywords = "Auditors’ professional skepticism, Cognitive neuroscience, Fraud detection, Skeptical judgment and action, Trait and state skepticism, Trust",
author = "Carmen Olsen and Anna Gold",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "127--141",
journal = "Journal of Accounting Literature",
issn = "0737-4607",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism. / Olsen, Carmen; Gold, Anna.

In: Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 41, 2018, p. 127-141.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism

AU - Olsen, Carmen

AU - Gold, Anna

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Drawing on the literature from cognitive neuroscience and auditing research on professional skepticism (PS), this paper identifies new research questions, determinants, and theories that may resolve current problem areas in PS research. We identify the following PS research areas that neuroscientific perspectives can potentially improve: 1) theory, 2) trust, 3) trait and state skepticism, 4) deception/fraud detection, and 5) skeptical judgment and action. The paper concludes with a discussion of the critical question of whether integrating a neuroscientific perspective in PS research is worthwhile and provides further direction for future research.

AB - Drawing on the literature from cognitive neuroscience and auditing research on professional skepticism (PS), this paper identifies new research questions, determinants, and theories that may resolve current problem areas in PS research. We identify the following PS research areas that neuroscientific perspectives can potentially improve: 1) theory, 2) trust, 3) trait and state skepticism, 4) deception/fraud detection, and 5) skeptical judgment and action. The paper concludes with a discussion of the critical question of whether integrating a neuroscientific perspective in PS research is worthwhile and provides further direction for future research.

KW - Auditors’ professional skepticism

KW - Cognitive neuroscience

KW - Fraud detection

KW - Skeptical judgment and action

KW - Trait and state skepticism

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045687056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045687056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 127

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Accounting Literature

JF - Journal of Accounting Literature

SN - 0737-4607

ER -