Gaitography on lower-limb amputees: Repeatability and between-methods agreement

Celine Timmermans, Andrea G. Cutti, Hester van Donkersgoed, Melvyn Roerdink

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Gaitography is gait parametrization from center-of-pressure trajectories of walking on an instrumented treadmill. Gaitograms may be useful for prosthetic gait analyses, as they can be rapidly and unobtrusively collected over multiple gait cycles without constraining foot placement. However, its reliability must still be established for prosthetic gait. Objectives: To evaluate (a) within-method test–retest repeatability and (b) between-methods agreement for temporal gait events (foot contact, foot off) and gait characteristics (e.g. step times, single-support duration). Study design: Cohort study with repeated measurements. Methods: Ten male proficient prosthetic walkers with a unilateral trans-femoral or trans-tibial amputation were equipped with a pressure-insole system and were invited to walk on separate days on an instrumented treadmill. Results: We found better between-methods reproducibility than within-method repeatability in temporal gait characteristics. Step times, stride times, and foot-contact events matched well between the two methods. In contrast, insole-based foot-off events were detected one-to-two samples earlier. Likewise, a similar bias was observed for temporal gait characteristics that incorporated foot-off events. Conclusion: Notwithstanding small systematic biases, the good between-methods agreement indicates that temporal gait characteristics may be determined interchangeably with gaitograms and insoles in persons with a prosthesis. However, the relatively poorer test–retest repeatability hinders longitudinal assessments with either method. Clinical relevance: Clinical practice could potentially benefit from gaitography as an efficient, unobtrusive, easy to use, automatized, and patient-friendly means to objectively parametrize prosthetic gait, with immediate availability of test results allowing for prompt clinical decision-making. Temporal gait parameters demonstrate good between-methods agreement, but poorer within-method repeatability hinders detecting prosthetic gait changes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages71-79
Number of pages9
JournalProsthetics and Orthotics International
Volume43
Issue number1
Early online date13 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Amputees
Gait
Lower Extremity
Foot
Walkers
Pressure
Thigh
Amputation
Prostheses and Implants
Walking
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • amputees
  • center of pressure
  • Gait
  • online event detection
  • treadmill test

Cite this

Timmermans, Celine ; Cutti, Andrea G. ; van Donkersgoed, Hester ; Roerdink, Melvyn. / Gaitography on lower-limb amputees : Repeatability and between-methods agreement. In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2019 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 71-79.
@article{526cdb9004e24f50b1070720e56c72fb,
title = "Gaitography on lower-limb amputees: Repeatability and between-methods agreement",
abstract = "Background: Gaitography is gait parametrization from center-of-pressure trajectories of walking on an instrumented treadmill. Gaitograms may be useful for prosthetic gait analyses, as they can be rapidly and unobtrusively collected over multiple gait cycles without constraining foot placement. However, its reliability must still be established for prosthetic gait. Objectives: To evaluate (a) within-method test–retest repeatability and (b) between-methods agreement for temporal gait events (foot contact, foot off) and gait characteristics (e.g. step times, single-support duration). Study design: Cohort study with repeated measurements. Methods: Ten male proficient prosthetic walkers with a unilateral trans-femoral or trans-tibial amputation were equipped with a pressure-insole system and were invited to walk on separate days on an instrumented treadmill. Results: We found better between-methods reproducibility than within-method repeatability in temporal gait characteristics. Step times, stride times, and foot-contact events matched well between the two methods. In contrast, insole-based foot-off events were detected one-to-two samples earlier. Likewise, a similar bias was observed for temporal gait characteristics that incorporated foot-off events. Conclusion: Notwithstanding small systematic biases, the good between-methods agreement indicates that temporal gait characteristics may be determined interchangeably with gaitograms and insoles in persons with a prosthesis. However, the relatively poorer test–retest repeatability hinders longitudinal assessments with either method. Clinical relevance: Clinical practice could potentially benefit from gaitography as an efficient, unobtrusive, easy to use, automatized, and patient-friendly means to objectively parametrize prosthetic gait, with immediate availability of test results allowing for prompt clinical decision-making. Temporal gait parameters demonstrate good between-methods agreement, but poorer within-method repeatability hinders detecting prosthetic gait changes.",
keywords = "amputees, center of pressure, Gait, online event detection, treadmill test",
author = "Celine Timmermans and Cutti, {Andrea G.} and {van Donkersgoed}, Hester and Melvyn Roerdink",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0309364618791618",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "71--79",
journal = "Prosthetics and Orthotics International",
issn = "0309-3646",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Gaitography on lower-limb amputees : Repeatability and between-methods agreement. / Timmermans, Celine; Cutti, Andrea G.; van Donkersgoed, Hester; Roerdink, Melvyn.

In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 71-79.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gaitography on lower-limb amputees

T2 - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

AU - Timmermans, Celine

AU - Cutti, Andrea G.

AU - van Donkersgoed, Hester

AU - Roerdink, Melvyn

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Background: Gaitography is gait parametrization from center-of-pressure trajectories of walking on an instrumented treadmill. Gaitograms may be useful for prosthetic gait analyses, as they can be rapidly and unobtrusively collected over multiple gait cycles without constraining foot placement. However, its reliability must still be established for prosthetic gait. Objectives: To evaluate (a) within-method test–retest repeatability and (b) between-methods agreement for temporal gait events (foot contact, foot off) and gait characteristics (e.g. step times, single-support duration). Study design: Cohort study with repeated measurements. Methods: Ten male proficient prosthetic walkers with a unilateral trans-femoral or trans-tibial amputation were equipped with a pressure-insole system and were invited to walk on separate days on an instrumented treadmill. Results: We found better between-methods reproducibility than within-method repeatability in temporal gait characteristics. Step times, stride times, and foot-contact events matched well between the two methods. In contrast, insole-based foot-off events were detected one-to-two samples earlier. Likewise, a similar bias was observed for temporal gait characteristics that incorporated foot-off events. Conclusion: Notwithstanding small systematic biases, the good between-methods agreement indicates that temporal gait characteristics may be determined interchangeably with gaitograms and insoles in persons with a prosthesis. However, the relatively poorer test–retest repeatability hinders longitudinal assessments with either method. Clinical relevance: Clinical practice could potentially benefit from gaitography as an efficient, unobtrusive, easy to use, automatized, and patient-friendly means to objectively parametrize prosthetic gait, with immediate availability of test results allowing for prompt clinical decision-making. Temporal gait parameters demonstrate good between-methods agreement, but poorer within-method repeatability hinders detecting prosthetic gait changes.

AB - Background: Gaitography is gait parametrization from center-of-pressure trajectories of walking on an instrumented treadmill. Gaitograms may be useful for prosthetic gait analyses, as they can be rapidly and unobtrusively collected over multiple gait cycles without constraining foot placement. However, its reliability must still be established for prosthetic gait. Objectives: To evaluate (a) within-method test–retest repeatability and (b) between-methods agreement for temporal gait events (foot contact, foot off) and gait characteristics (e.g. step times, single-support duration). Study design: Cohort study with repeated measurements. Methods: Ten male proficient prosthetic walkers with a unilateral trans-femoral or trans-tibial amputation were equipped with a pressure-insole system and were invited to walk on separate days on an instrumented treadmill. Results: We found better between-methods reproducibility than within-method repeatability in temporal gait characteristics. Step times, stride times, and foot-contact events matched well between the two methods. In contrast, insole-based foot-off events were detected one-to-two samples earlier. Likewise, a similar bias was observed for temporal gait characteristics that incorporated foot-off events. Conclusion: Notwithstanding small systematic biases, the good between-methods agreement indicates that temporal gait characteristics may be determined interchangeably with gaitograms and insoles in persons with a prosthesis. However, the relatively poorer test–retest repeatability hinders longitudinal assessments with either method. Clinical relevance: Clinical practice could potentially benefit from gaitography as an efficient, unobtrusive, easy to use, automatized, and patient-friendly means to objectively parametrize prosthetic gait, with immediate availability of test results allowing for prompt clinical decision-making. Temporal gait parameters demonstrate good between-methods agreement, but poorer within-method repeatability hinders detecting prosthetic gait changes.

KW - amputees

KW - center of pressure

KW - Gait

KW - online event detection

KW - treadmill test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052605099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052605099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0309364618791618

DO - 10.1177/0309364618791618

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 71

EP - 79

JO - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

JF - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

SN - 0309-3646

IS - 1

ER -