Gender differences in poverty: a cross-national study

P. Wiepking, W.A.F. Maas

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we describe and explain country differences in the effect of gender on the risk of becoming poor, using data from the Luxembourg Income Study on 22 industrialized countries. Although in most countries women are more likely to become poor than men, this is not the case for all countries. Composition effects explain 18 per cent of the country differences: differences in the educational level of the population are most important, whereas labor market participation plays a smaller role. Country characteristics, especially economic growth and social-democratic tradition, explain between 29 and 36 per cent of the country differences in the gender-poverty-gap. Both composition effects and country characteristics are better suited to explaining the disadvantages of women than the disadvantages of men.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-200
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Sociological Review
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

gender-specific factors
poverty
Luxembourg
gender
economic growth
labor market
income
participation

Cite this

@article{8ad5b4f300c740579416a31f8ca4ad75,
title = "Gender differences in poverty: a cross-national study",
abstract = "In this paper we describe and explain country differences in the effect of gender on the risk of becoming poor, using data from the Luxembourg Income Study on 22 industrialized countries. Although in most countries women are more likely to become poor than men, this is not the case for all countries. Composition effects explain 18 per cent of the country differences: differences in the educational level of the population are most important, whereas labor market participation plays a smaller role. Country characteristics, especially economic growth and social-democratic tradition, explain between 29 and 36 per cent of the country differences in the gender-poverty-gap. Both composition effects and country characteristics are better suited to explaining the disadvantages of women than the disadvantages of men.",
author = "P. Wiepking and W.A.F. Maas",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1093/esr/jci021",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "187--200",
journal = "European Sociological Review",
issn = "0266-7215",
publisher = "Unesco & Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Gender differences in poverty: a cross-national study. / Wiepking, P.; Maas, W.A.F.

In: European Sociological Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2005, p. 187-200.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in poverty: a cross-national study

AU - Wiepking, P.

AU - Maas, W.A.F.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In this paper we describe and explain country differences in the effect of gender on the risk of becoming poor, using data from the Luxembourg Income Study on 22 industrialized countries. Although in most countries women are more likely to become poor than men, this is not the case for all countries. Composition effects explain 18 per cent of the country differences: differences in the educational level of the population are most important, whereas labor market participation plays a smaller role. Country characteristics, especially economic growth and social-democratic tradition, explain between 29 and 36 per cent of the country differences in the gender-poverty-gap. Both composition effects and country characteristics are better suited to explaining the disadvantages of women than the disadvantages of men.

AB - In this paper we describe and explain country differences in the effect of gender on the risk of becoming poor, using data from the Luxembourg Income Study on 22 industrialized countries. Although in most countries women are more likely to become poor than men, this is not the case for all countries. Composition effects explain 18 per cent of the country differences: differences in the educational level of the population are most important, whereas labor market participation plays a smaller role. Country characteristics, especially economic growth and social-democratic tradition, explain between 29 and 36 per cent of the country differences in the gender-poverty-gap. Both composition effects and country characteristics are better suited to explaining the disadvantages of women than the disadvantages of men.

U2 - 10.1093/esr/jci021

DO - 10.1093/esr/jci021

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 187

EP - 200

JO - European Sociological Review

JF - European Sociological Review

SN - 0266-7215

IS - 3

ER -