Abstract
We study whether gender influences credit attribution for group work using observational data and two experiments. We use data from academic economists to test whether coauthorship matters differently for tenure for men and women. We find that, conditional on quality and other observables, men are tenured similarly regardless of whether they coauthor or solo author. Women, however, are less likely to receive tenure the more they coauthor. We then conduct two experiments that demonstrate that biases in credit attribution in settings without confounds exist. Taken together, our results are best explained by gender and stereotypes influencing credit attribution for group work.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-147 |
Number of pages | 47 |
Journal | Journal of Political Economy |
Volume | 129 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in recognition for group work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Dataset for Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work
Gërxhani, K. (Creator), Sarsons, H. (Creator), Reuben, E. (Creator) & Schram, A. (Creator), The University of Chicago Press, 2021
DOI: 10.1086/711401, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/suppl/10.1086/711401
Dataset / Software: Dataset