Gender-differentiated effects of theory of mind, emotion understanding, and social preference on prosocial behavior development: A longitudinal study

Rebecca-Lee Kuhnert, Sander Begeer, Elian Fink, Marc de Rosnay

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

132 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although key differences have been found in boys’ and girls’ prosocial behavior toward peers, few studies have systematically examined gender differences in how intrinsic perspective-taking abilities—theory of mind (ToM) and emotion understanding (EU)—and the extrinsic peer environment relate to prosocial behavior. In this prospective longitudinal study, we studied gender differences in the relations between children's observed prosocial behavior and their ToM, EU, and social preference ratings in 114 children (58 boys and 56 girls). We used conventional ToM and EU tasks at 5 and 7 years of age. Observed prosocial behavior in triadic peer interactions was assessed at both time points. Controlling for gender, age, verbal ability, and earlier prosocial behavior, ToM at 5 years was found to predict prosocial behavior at 7 years. Results also revealed gender-differentiated associations at 7 years, whereby only girls’ prosocial behavior was positively associated with EU. Results are discussed in terms of gender-differentiated patterns of socialization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-27
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume154
Early online date22 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Funding

FundersFunder number
Australian Research CouncilDP0881855
Australian Research Council

    Keywords

    • Emotion understanding
    • Gender differences
    • Longitudinal study
    • Prosocial behavior
    • Social preference
    • Theory of mind

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender-differentiated effects of theory of mind, emotion understanding, and social preference on prosocial behavior development: A longitudinal study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this