Gender-Sensitive Violence Risk Assessment: Predictive Validity of Six Tools in Female Forensic Psychiatric Patients

Vivienne de Vogel, Mieke Bruggeman, Marike Lancel

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Most violence risk assessment tools have been validated predominantly in males. In this multicenter study, the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 (HCR-20), Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 Version 3 (HCR-20 V3 ), Female Additional Manual (FAM), Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START), Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF), and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) were coded on file information of 78 female forensic psychiatric patients discharged between 1993 and 2012 with a mean follow-up period of 11.8 years from one of four Dutch forensic psychiatric hospitals. Notable was the high rate of mortality (17.9%) and readmission to psychiatric settings (11.5%) after discharge. Official reconviction data could be retrieved from the Ministry of Justice and Security for 71 women. Twenty-four women (33.8%) were reconvicted after discharge, including 13 for violent offenses (18.3%). Overall, predictive validity was moderate for all types of recidivism, but low for violence. The START Vulnerability scores, HCR-20 V3 , and FAM showed the highest predictive accuracy for all recidivism. With respect to violent recidivism, only the START Vulnerability scores and the Clinical scale of the HCR-20 V3 demonstrated significant predictive accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)528-549
Number of pages22
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Forensic Psychiatry
Violence
risk assessment
violence
gender
Social Justice
Psychiatric Hospitals
vulnerability
Multicenter Studies
Psychiatry
psychiatric hospital
Mortality
ministry
mortality
justice
offense

Keywords

  • female forensic psychiatric patients
  • gender
  • mortality
  • recidivism
  • risk assessment

Cite this

@article{6ba13edce6bf46819ab13b8c45d21e6c,
title = "Gender-Sensitive Violence Risk Assessment: Predictive Validity of Six Tools in Female Forensic Psychiatric Patients",
abstract = "Most violence risk assessment tools have been validated predominantly in males. In this multicenter study, the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 (HCR-20), Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 Version 3 (HCR-20 V3 ), Female Additional Manual (FAM), Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START), Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF), and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) were coded on file information of 78 female forensic psychiatric patients discharged between 1993 and 2012 with a mean follow-up period of 11.8 years from one of four Dutch forensic psychiatric hospitals. Notable was the high rate of mortality (17.9{\%}) and readmission to psychiatric settings (11.5{\%}) after discharge. Official reconviction data could be retrieved from the Ministry of Justice and Security for 71 women. Twenty-four women (33.8{\%}) were reconvicted after discharge, including 13 for violent offenses (18.3{\%}). Overall, predictive validity was moderate for all types of recidivism, but low for violence. The START Vulnerability scores, HCR-20 V3 , and FAM showed the highest predictive accuracy for all recidivism. With respect to violent recidivism, only the START Vulnerability scores and the Clinical scale of the HCR-20 V3 demonstrated significant predictive accuracy.",
keywords = "female forensic psychiatric patients, gender, mortality, recidivism, risk assessment",
author = "{de Vogel}, Vivienne and Mieke Bruggeman and Marike Lancel",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093854818824135",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "528--549",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Gender-Sensitive Violence Risk Assessment : Predictive Validity of Six Tools in Female Forensic Psychiatric Patients. / de Vogel, Vivienne; Bruggeman, Mieke; Lancel, Marike.

In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 46, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 528-549.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender-Sensitive Violence Risk Assessment

T2 - Predictive Validity of Six Tools in Female Forensic Psychiatric Patients

AU - de Vogel, Vivienne

AU - Bruggeman, Mieke

AU - Lancel, Marike

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Most violence risk assessment tools have been validated predominantly in males. In this multicenter study, the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 (HCR-20), Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 Version 3 (HCR-20 V3 ), Female Additional Manual (FAM), Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START), Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF), and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) were coded on file information of 78 female forensic psychiatric patients discharged between 1993 and 2012 with a mean follow-up period of 11.8 years from one of four Dutch forensic psychiatric hospitals. Notable was the high rate of mortality (17.9%) and readmission to psychiatric settings (11.5%) after discharge. Official reconviction data could be retrieved from the Ministry of Justice and Security for 71 women. Twenty-four women (33.8%) were reconvicted after discharge, including 13 for violent offenses (18.3%). Overall, predictive validity was moderate for all types of recidivism, but low for violence. The START Vulnerability scores, HCR-20 V3 , and FAM showed the highest predictive accuracy for all recidivism. With respect to violent recidivism, only the START Vulnerability scores and the Clinical scale of the HCR-20 V3 demonstrated significant predictive accuracy.

AB - Most violence risk assessment tools have been validated predominantly in males. In this multicenter study, the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 (HCR-20), Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 Version 3 (HCR-20 V3 ), Female Additional Manual (FAM), Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START), Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF), and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) were coded on file information of 78 female forensic psychiatric patients discharged between 1993 and 2012 with a mean follow-up period of 11.8 years from one of four Dutch forensic psychiatric hospitals. Notable was the high rate of mortality (17.9%) and readmission to psychiatric settings (11.5%) after discharge. Official reconviction data could be retrieved from the Ministry of Justice and Security for 71 women. Twenty-four women (33.8%) were reconvicted after discharge, including 13 for violent offenses (18.3%). Overall, predictive validity was moderate for all types of recidivism, but low for violence. The START Vulnerability scores, HCR-20 V3 , and FAM showed the highest predictive accuracy for all recidivism. With respect to violent recidivism, only the START Vulnerability scores and the Clinical scale of the HCR-20 V3 demonstrated significant predictive accuracy.

KW - female forensic psychiatric patients

KW - gender

KW - mortality

KW - recidivism

KW - risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060675661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060675661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854818824135

DO - 10.1177/0093854818824135

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 528

EP - 549

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 4

ER -