Gender, Sexuality, Asylum and European Human Rights

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Asylum law functions through a dichotomy between an idealized notion of Europe as a site characterized by human rights, and non-European countries as sites of oppression. In most social sciences and humanities literature, this dichotomy is seen as legitimizing European dominance and exclusion of non-Europeans. However, it is the same dichotomy which is used by asylum seekers to claim inclusion through the grant of asylum. Focusing on the inclusive potential of this exclusive dichotomy allows us to explore the ambiguities inherent in the dichotomy. In asylum claims based on persecution on account of gender and sexuality, it becomes evident that not all human rights are considered equally fundamental. In many cases, asylum seekers are required to renounce human rights in order to prevent persecution, for example by complying with patriarchal family norms. Even where this requirement is rejected, asylum law illustrates the ambiguous relation between Europe and human rights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-239
Number of pages19
JournalLaw and Critique
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Bibliographical note

Electronic advance access publication


Dive into the research topics of 'Gender, Sexuality, Asylum and European Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this