Abstract
This article presents an overview of the recent literature on gendered patterns of academic choice in mathematics, science, and technology. It distinguishes in this literature micro-level, macro-level, and institutional explanations. Micro-level explanations focus primarily on psychological constructs, that is, variables at the level of the individual students. Macro-level explanations focus primarily on socioeconomic conditions and cultural understandings of gender roles. Institutional explanations focus on design characteristics of (national) education systems. After a presentation of these perspectives and of recent research progress that has been made, the authors critically discuss the lacunae that still exist in explaining cross-national variety, and provide suggestions for designing future research in this field. © 2013 © 2013 Taylor & Francis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 525-545 |
| Journal | Educational Research and Evaluation |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 28 Jun 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gendered study choice: a literature review. A review of theory and research into the unequal representation of male and female students in mathematics, science, and technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver