Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on the drivers of intention and behavior

J.W.C. Arts, R.T. Frambach, T.H.A. Bijmolt

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Previous research has shown that consumer intentions to adopt innovations are often poor predictors of adoption behavior. An important reason for this may be that the evaluative criteria consumers use in both stages of the adoption process weigh differently. Using construal level theory, we develop expectations on the influence of innovation characteristics across the intention and behavior stages of the adoption process. Using meta-analysis, we derive generalizations on drivers of intentions and actual innovation adoption behavior. The results show important differences across both stages. Consumers show higher levels of adoption intention for innovations that are more complex, better match their needs, and involve lower uncertainty. However, consumers are found to actually adopt innovations with less complexity and higher relative advantages. Adopter demographics are found to explain little variance in adoption intention and behavior, whereas adopter psychographics are found to be influential in both stages. These findings have implications for innovation adoption theory, for managers involved in new product and service marketing, and for future research on innovation adoption. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-144
JournalInternational Journal of Research in Marketing
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Innovation adoption
Meta-analysis
Innovation
Services marketing
New products
Construal level theory
Predictors
Relative advantage
Managers
Psychographics
Uncertainty
Demographics
Innovation characteristics
New services

Cite this

@article{88ce74aced3b49dab629496332b10be0,
title = "Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on the drivers of intention and behavior",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that consumer intentions to adopt innovations are often poor predictors of adoption behavior. An important reason for this may be that the evaluative criteria consumers use in both stages of the adoption process weigh differently. Using construal level theory, we develop expectations on the influence of innovation characteristics across the intention and behavior stages of the adoption process. Using meta-analysis, we derive generalizations on drivers of intentions and actual innovation adoption behavior. The results show important differences across both stages. Consumers show higher levels of adoption intention for innovations that are more complex, better match their needs, and involve lower uncertainty. However, consumers are found to actually adopt innovations with less complexity and higher relative advantages. Adopter demographics are found to explain little variance in adoption intention and behavior, whereas adopter psychographics are found to be influential in both stages. These findings have implications for innovation adoption theory, for managers involved in new product and service marketing, and for future research on innovation adoption. {\circledC} 2011 Elsevier B.V.",
author = "J.W.C. Arts and R.T. Frambach and T.H.A. Bijmolt",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "134--144",
journal = "International Journal of Research in Marketing",
issn = "0167-8116",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on the drivers of intention and behavior. / Arts, J.W.C.; Frambach, R.T.; Bijmolt, T.H.A.

In: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2011, p. 134-144.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on the drivers of intention and behavior

AU - Arts, J.W.C.

AU - Frambach, R.T.

AU - Bijmolt, T.H.A.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Previous research has shown that consumer intentions to adopt innovations are often poor predictors of adoption behavior. An important reason for this may be that the evaluative criteria consumers use in both stages of the adoption process weigh differently. Using construal level theory, we develop expectations on the influence of innovation characteristics across the intention and behavior stages of the adoption process. Using meta-analysis, we derive generalizations on drivers of intentions and actual innovation adoption behavior. The results show important differences across both stages. Consumers show higher levels of adoption intention for innovations that are more complex, better match their needs, and involve lower uncertainty. However, consumers are found to actually adopt innovations with less complexity and higher relative advantages. Adopter demographics are found to explain little variance in adoption intention and behavior, whereas adopter psychographics are found to be influential in both stages. These findings have implications for innovation adoption theory, for managers involved in new product and service marketing, and for future research on innovation adoption. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.

AB - Previous research has shown that consumer intentions to adopt innovations are often poor predictors of adoption behavior. An important reason for this may be that the evaluative criteria consumers use in both stages of the adoption process weigh differently. Using construal level theory, we develop expectations on the influence of innovation characteristics across the intention and behavior stages of the adoption process. Using meta-analysis, we derive generalizations on drivers of intentions and actual innovation adoption behavior. The results show important differences across both stages. Consumers show higher levels of adoption intention for innovations that are more complex, better match their needs, and involve lower uncertainty. However, consumers are found to actually adopt innovations with less complexity and higher relative advantages. Adopter demographics are found to explain little variance in adoption intention and behavior, whereas adopter psychographics are found to be influential in both stages. These findings have implications for innovation adoption theory, for managers involved in new product and service marketing, and for future research on innovation adoption. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.11.002

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 134

EP - 144

JO - International Journal of Research in Marketing

JF - International Journal of Research in Marketing

SN - 0167-8116

IS - 2

ER -