Generic physiologically based kinetic modelling for farm animals: Part II. Predicting tissue concentrations of chemicals in swine, cattle, and sheep

L.S. Lautz, S. Hoeks, R. Oldenkamp, A.J. Hendriks, J.L.C.M. Dorne, A.M.J. Ragas

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© 2019 The AuthorsThe development of three generic multi-compartment physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models is described for farm animal species, i.e. cattle, sheep, and swine. The PBK models allow one to quantitatively link external dose and internal dose for risk assessment of chemicals relevant to food and feed safety. Model performance is illustrated by predicting tissue concentrations of melamine and oxytetracycline and validated through comparison with measured data. Overall, model predictions were reliable with 71% of predictions within a 3-fold of the measured data for all three species and only 6% of predictions were outside a 10-fold of the measured data. Predictions within a 3-fold change were best for cattle, followed by sheep, and swine (82%, 76%, and 63%). Global sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the most sensitive parameters in the PBK model. The sensitivity analysis showed that body weight and cardiac output were the most sensitive parameters. Since interspecies differences in metabolism impact on the fate of a wide range of chemicals, a key step forward is the introduction of species-specific information on transporters and metabolism including expression and activities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-56
JournalToxicology Letters
Volume318
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was supported by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [Contract number: EFSA/SCER/2014/06]. Appendix A

FundersFunder number
European Food Safety AuthorityEFSA/SCER/2014/06

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Generic physiologically based kinetic modelling for farm animals: Part II. Predicting tissue concentrations of chemicals in swine, cattle, and sheep'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this