Abstract
We develop a stochastic decision model to analyse the global competitive dynamics of fossil fuels and renewable energy. It describes coal, oil/gas, solar and wind. These differ not only in pollution intensities but also in profitability and innovation potential. The model accounts for the effect of learning curves, path-dependence and climate policies. Adoption shares endogenously affect agents' utility through increasing returns to adoption, learning, and a ‘peak oil’ capacity constraint. We find that peak oil induces a transition to coal rather than renewable energy, which worsens climate change. By introducing climate policies - such as a carbon tax, market adoption or R&D subsidies for renewables, and eliminating existing subsidies for fossil fuels - we identify potential transition patterns to a low-carbon energy system. Model analysis clarifies two main features of climate policies: which ones solve the climate problem, i.e. do not surpass the critical carbon budget; and how uncertain or variable are final market shares of energy sources.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 110907 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-24 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Energy Policy |
Volume | 136 |
Early online date | 25 Nov 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2020 |
Funding
We thank Ivan Savin for useful comments on the manuscript. The paper has benefited from presentations at Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (Milan, Italy) and the Institute for New Economic Thinking (Oxford, UK). Jeroen van den Bergh received support through an ERC Advanced Grant from the European Research Council ( ERC ) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [grant agreement n o 741087]. Appendix A
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei | |
Institute for New Economic Thinking | |
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | |
European Research Council | |
Horizon 2020 | 741087 |
Keywords
- Climate change
- Energy policy
- Externalities
- Learning
- Peak oil