TY - JOUR
T1 - Global Justice and Childhood
T2 - Introduction
AU - Drerup, Johannes
AU - Schweiger, Gottfried
N1 - Special Issue: Global Justice and Childhood
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This brief introduction frames a guest-edited collection of eleven contributed articles in the Journal of Global Ethics focused on global justice and childhood. On a general level, there is widespread consensus that there is a strong need for improvement in the lives of children around the globe. What global justice demands in this regard, however, has never been fleshed out in detail and there is only a little philosophical literature on this topic. Against this background, five aspects of the question of global justice for children need to be addressed. First, one has to take into account the debate between cosmopolitanism and particularism, as well as the debate as to whether and to what extent individual, collective or institutional actors should be prioritized. Secondly, a theory of global justice for children must explain how the content of global justice for children is founded and justified, and what it comprises. Third, different principles can be used to assess global justice for children. Only two prominent alternatives are mentioned here: egalitarianism and sufficiency. Fourthly, the temporal dimension of global justice is of particular importance for children. Fifthly, an approach focusing on the examination of injustices is equally necessary.
AB - This brief introduction frames a guest-edited collection of eleven contributed articles in the Journal of Global Ethics focused on global justice and childhood. On a general level, there is widespread consensus that there is a strong need for improvement in the lives of children around the globe. What global justice demands in this regard, however, has never been fleshed out in detail and there is only a little philosophical literature on this topic. Against this background, five aspects of the question of global justice for children need to be addressed. First, one has to take into account the debate between cosmopolitanism and particularism, as well as the debate as to whether and to what extent individual, collective or institutional actors should be prioritized. Secondly, a theory of global justice for children must explain how the content of global justice for children is founded and justified, and what it comprises. Third, different principles can be used to assess global justice for children. Only two prominent alternatives are mentioned here: egalitarianism and sufficiency. Fourthly, the temporal dimension of global justice is of particular importance for children. Fifthly, an approach focusing on the examination of injustices is equally necessary.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074981617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074981617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17449626.2019.1686711
DO - 10.1080/17449626.2019.1686711
M3 - Editorial
SN - 1744-9634
VL - 15
SP - 193
EP - 201
JO - Journal of Global Ethics
JF - Journal of Global Ethics
IS - 3
ER -