God the Almighty and the Tenacity of Onto-Theology: Impasse in Merold Westphal’s God-Talk

This paper argues that Westphal’s attempt to overcome onto-theology paradoxically collapses back into it—not through conceptual inconsistency but through a structural reinscription of the very hierarchy he seeks to escape. The argument begins by examining Westphal’s understanding of onto-theology and critically assessing his appropriation of Augustine and Kierkegaard (the latter via Levinas), culminating in his affirmation of “God the Almighty.” This critique is particularly warranted given that Westphal elevates Kierkegaard as the paradigmatic figure for overcoming onto-theology. Subsequently, by drawing on Derrida and Caputo, the study introduces an expanded understanding of onto-theology—encompassing the critique of theocentrism and the obsession with purity—to expose the lacunae in Westphal’s approach. While Westphal successfully avoids the production of a God to whom one cannot pray or offer praise, his project nonetheless remains entrapped within the orbit of onto-theology as theocentrism. The paper concludes by indicating that such attempts to overcome onto-theology risk regressing into a theocentric structure, with significant implications for how religious discourse shapes ethical and political life. Ultimately, it highlights that his hermeneutical approach to God remains firmly theological—indeed, all too theological—and unable to transcend the hermeneutics of religious life.