Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Targets are widely employed in environmental governance. In this paper, we investigate the construction of the 2 ?C climate target, one of the best known targets in global environmental governance. Our paper examines this target through a historical reconstruction that identifies four different phases: framing, consolidation and diffusion, adoption, and dis- embeddedness. Our analysis shows that, initially, the target was science-driven and predomi- nantlyEU-based; it then becameprogressively accepted at the international level, despite a lack of broader debate among governments on the policy implications and required measures for implementation.Once the2 ?Ctargetwas endorsedat the level of theUnitedNations, thenature of the targetchangedfrombeingpolicy-prescriptive tobeinglargelysymbolic. In thisphase, the target became a disembedded object in global governance not linked to a shared agenda nor to coordinated andmutually binding mitigation efforts. The 2015 Paris Agreement marks the last stage in this development andmay have further solidified the target as a disembedded object. In the final part of the paper, wesuggestways to overcome the current situation and to develop the 2 ?C target into a fully fledged global environmental governance target.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-676
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

consolidation
mitigation
climate
analysis
policy
science

Keywords

  • 2 ??C target
  • Climate governance
  • Global environmental governance
  • Governing by targets
  • International relations and politics

Cite this

@article{9be1e297a92a4227a1e99204d35d2f31,
title = "Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target",
abstract = "Targets are widely employed in environmental governance. In this paper, we investigate the construction of the 2 ?C climate target, one of the best known targets in global environmental governance. Our paper examines this target through a historical reconstruction that identifies four different phases: framing, consolidation and diffusion, adoption, and dis- embeddedness. Our analysis shows that, initially, the target was science-driven and predomi- nantlyEU-based; it then becameprogressively accepted at the international level, despite a lack of broader debate among governments on the policy implications and required measures for implementation.Once the2 ?Ctargetwas endorsedat the level of theUnitedNations, thenature of the targetchangedfrombeingpolicy-prescriptive tobeinglargelysymbolic. In thisphase, the target became a disembedded object in global governance not linked to a shared agenda nor to coordinated andmutually binding mitigation efforts. The 2015 Paris Agreement marks the last stage in this development andmay have further solidified the target as a disembedded object. In the final part of the paper, wesuggestways to overcome the current situation and to develop the 2 ?C target into a fully fledged global environmental governance target.",
keywords = "2 ??C target, Climate governance, Global environmental governance, Governing by targets, International relations and politics",
author = "Piero Morseletto and Frank Biermann and P.H. Pattberg",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "655--676",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1573-1553",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target

AU - Morseletto, Piero

AU - Biermann, Frank

AU - Pattberg, P.H.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Targets are widely employed in environmental governance. In this paper, we investigate the construction of the 2 ?C climate target, one of the best known targets in global environmental governance. Our paper examines this target through a historical reconstruction that identifies four different phases: framing, consolidation and diffusion, adoption, and dis- embeddedness. Our analysis shows that, initially, the target was science-driven and predomi- nantlyEU-based; it then becameprogressively accepted at the international level, despite a lack of broader debate among governments on the policy implications and required measures for implementation.Once the2 ?Ctargetwas endorsedat the level of theUnitedNations, thenature of the targetchangedfrombeingpolicy-prescriptive tobeinglargelysymbolic. In thisphase, the target became a disembedded object in global governance not linked to a shared agenda nor to coordinated andmutually binding mitigation efforts. The 2015 Paris Agreement marks the last stage in this development andmay have further solidified the target as a disembedded object. In the final part of the paper, wesuggestways to overcome the current situation and to develop the 2 ?C target into a fully fledged global environmental governance target.

AB - Targets are widely employed in environmental governance. In this paper, we investigate the construction of the 2 ?C climate target, one of the best known targets in global environmental governance. Our paper examines this target through a historical reconstruction that identifies four different phases: framing, consolidation and diffusion, adoption, and dis- embeddedness. Our analysis shows that, initially, the target was science-driven and predomi- nantlyEU-based; it then becameprogressively accepted at the international level, despite a lack of broader debate among governments on the policy implications and required measures for implementation.Once the2 ?Ctargetwas endorsedat the level of theUnitedNations, thenature of the targetchangedfrombeingpolicy-prescriptive tobeinglargelysymbolic. In thisphase, the target became a disembedded object in global governance not linked to a shared agenda nor to coordinated andmutually binding mitigation efforts. The 2015 Paris Agreement marks the last stage in this development andmay have further solidified the target as a disembedded object. In the final part of the paper, wesuggestways to overcome the current situation and to develop the 2 ?C target into a fully fledged global environmental governance target.

KW - 2 ??C target

KW - Climate governance

KW - Global environmental governance

KW - Governing by targets

KW - International relations and politics

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7

DO - 10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 655

EP - 676

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1573-1553

IS - 5

ER -