TY - JOUR
T1 - Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target
AU - Morseletto, Piero
AU - Biermann, Frank
AU - Pattberg, P.H.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Targets are widely employed in environmental governance. In this paper, we investigate the construction of the 2 ?C climate target, one of the best known targets in global environmental governance. Our paper examines this target through a historical reconstruction that identifies four different phases: framing, consolidation and diffusion, adoption, and dis- embeddedness. Our analysis shows that, initially, the target was science-driven and predomi- nantlyEU-based; it then becameprogressively accepted at the international level, despite a lack of broader debate among governments on the policy implications and required measures for implementation.Once the2 ?Ctargetwas endorsedat the level of theUnitedNations, thenature of the targetchangedfrombeingpolicy-prescriptive tobeinglargelysymbolic. In thisphase, the target became a disembedded object in global governance not linked to a shared agenda nor to coordinated andmutually binding mitigation efforts. The 2015 Paris Agreement marks the last stage in this development andmay have further solidified the target as a disembedded object. In the final part of the paper, wesuggestways to overcome the current situation and to develop the 2 ?C target into a fully fledged global environmental governance target.
AB - Targets are widely employed in environmental governance. In this paper, we investigate the construction of the 2 ?C climate target, one of the best known targets in global environmental governance. Our paper examines this target through a historical reconstruction that identifies four different phases: framing, consolidation and diffusion, adoption, and dis- embeddedness. Our analysis shows that, initially, the target was science-driven and predomi- nantlyEU-based; it then becameprogressively accepted at the international level, despite a lack of broader debate among governments on the policy implications and required measures for implementation.Once the2 ?Ctargetwas endorsedat the level of theUnitedNations, thenature of the targetchangedfrombeingpolicy-prescriptive tobeinglargelysymbolic. In thisphase, the target became a disembedded object in global governance not linked to a shared agenda nor to coordinated andmutually binding mitigation efforts. The 2015 Paris Agreement marks the last stage in this development andmay have further solidified the target as a disembedded object. In the final part of the paper, wesuggestways to overcome the current situation and to develop the 2 ?C target into a fully fledged global environmental governance target.
KW - 2 ??C target
KW - Climate governance
KW - Global environmental governance
KW - Governing by targets
KW - International relations and politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990865995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990865995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7
DO - 10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7
M3 - Article
SN - 1567-9764
VL - 17
SP - 655
EP - 676
JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
IS - 5
ER -