Grade expectations: Rationality and overconfidence

Jan R. Magnus, Anatoly A. Peresetsky

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Confidence and overconfidence are essential aspects of human nature, but measuring (over)confidence is not easy. Our approach is to consider students' forecasts of their exam grades. Part of a student's grade expectation is based on the student's previous academic achievements; what remains can be interpreted as (over)confidence. Our results are based on a sample of about 500 second-year undergraduate students enrolled in a statistics course in Moscow. The course contains three exams and each student produces a forecast for each of the three exams. Our models allow us to estimate overconfidence quantitatively. Using these models we find that students' expectations are not rational and that most students are overconfident, in agreement with the general literature. Less obvious is that overconfidence helps: given the same academic achievement students with larger confidence obtain higher exam grades. Female students are less overconfident than male students, their forecasts are more rational, and they are also faster learners in the sense that they adjust their expectations more rapidly.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2346
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume8
Issue number2346
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Students
Moscow

Keywords

  • Behavioral education
  • Classroom experiment
  • Education
  • Gender difference
  • Overconfidence
  • Persistence
  • Rational expectations

Cite this

Magnus, Jan R. ; Peresetsky, Anatoly A. / Grade expectations : Rationality and overconfidence. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 2346. pp. 1-10.
@article{8f637152d1374ea7b68b65a7c745c592,
title = "Grade expectations: Rationality and overconfidence",
abstract = "Confidence and overconfidence are essential aspects of human nature, but measuring (over)confidence is not easy. Our approach is to consider students' forecasts of their exam grades. Part of a student's grade expectation is based on the student's previous academic achievements; what remains can be interpreted as (over)confidence. Our results are based on a sample of about 500 second-year undergraduate students enrolled in a statistics course in Moscow. The course contains three exams and each student produces a forecast for each of the three exams. Our models allow us to estimate overconfidence quantitatively. Using these models we find that students' expectations are not rational and that most students are overconfident, in agreement with the general literature. Less obvious is that overconfidence helps: given the same academic achievement students with larger confidence obtain higher exam grades. Female students are less overconfident than male students, their forecasts are more rational, and they are also faster learners in the sense that they adjust their expectations more rapidly.",
keywords = "Behavioral education, Classroom experiment, Education, Gender difference, Overconfidence, Persistence, Rational expectations",
author = "Magnus, {Jan R.} and Peresetsky, {Anatoly A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "12",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02346",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",
number = "2346",

}

Grade expectations : Rationality and overconfidence. / Magnus, Jan R.; Peresetsky, Anatoly A.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2346, 2346, 12.01.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grade expectations

T2 - Rationality and overconfidence

AU - Magnus, Jan R.

AU - Peresetsky, Anatoly A.

PY - 2018/1/12

Y1 - 2018/1/12

N2 - Confidence and overconfidence are essential aspects of human nature, but measuring (over)confidence is not easy. Our approach is to consider students' forecasts of their exam grades. Part of a student's grade expectation is based on the student's previous academic achievements; what remains can be interpreted as (over)confidence. Our results are based on a sample of about 500 second-year undergraduate students enrolled in a statistics course in Moscow. The course contains three exams and each student produces a forecast for each of the three exams. Our models allow us to estimate overconfidence quantitatively. Using these models we find that students' expectations are not rational and that most students are overconfident, in agreement with the general literature. Less obvious is that overconfidence helps: given the same academic achievement students with larger confidence obtain higher exam grades. Female students are less overconfident than male students, their forecasts are more rational, and they are also faster learners in the sense that they adjust their expectations more rapidly.

AB - Confidence and overconfidence are essential aspects of human nature, but measuring (over)confidence is not easy. Our approach is to consider students' forecasts of their exam grades. Part of a student's grade expectation is based on the student's previous academic achievements; what remains can be interpreted as (over)confidence. Our results are based on a sample of about 500 second-year undergraduate students enrolled in a statistics course in Moscow. The course contains three exams and each student produces a forecast for each of the three exams. Our models allow us to estimate overconfidence quantitatively. Using these models we find that students' expectations are not rational and that most students are overconfident, in agreement with the general literature. Less obvious is that overconfidence helps: given the same academic achievement students with larger confidence obtain higher exam grades. Female students are less overconfident than male students, their forecasts are more rational, and they are also faster learners in the sense that they adjust their expectations more rapidly.

KW - Behavioral education

KW - Classroom experiment

KW - Education

KW - Gender difference

KW - Overconfidence

KW - Persistence

KW - Rational expectations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040465522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040465522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02346

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02346

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - 2346

M1 - 2346

ER -