Group Therapy for Schizophrenia: Why Burlingame et al. (2020) Should Redo Their Meta-Analysis

Steffen Moritz*, David Turner, Andreas Bechdolf, Daniel R. Mueller, Todd S. Woodward, Danielle Penney, Stephanie Mehl

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Comments on the meta-analysis by G. M. Burlingame et al. (see record 2020-37337-001) on group therapy in schizophrenia. The commenting authors explain why they think that the meta-analysis is seriously flawed and should be recalculated and updated. First, however, they briefly reflect on the role of meta-analyses in contemporary research to emphasize that this discussion is not merely an academic debate but may have significant implications for the psychotherapeutic landscape as a whole.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-135
Number of pages3
JournalPsychotherapy
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. American Psychological Association

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Group Therapy for Schizophrenia: Why Burlingame et al. (2020) Should Redo Their Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this