Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Group Therapy for Schizophrenia: Why Burlingame et al. (2020) Should Redo Their Meta-Analysis

  • Steffen Moritz*
  • , David Turner
  • , Andreas Bechdolf
  • , Daniel R. Mueller
  • , Todd S. Woodward
  • , Danielle Penney
  • , Stephanie Mehl
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Comments on the meta-analysis by G. M. Burlingame et al. (see record 2020-37337-001) on group therapy in schizophrenia. The commenting authors explain why they think that the meta-analysis is seriously flawed and should be recalculated and updated. First, however, they briefly reflect on the role of meta-analyses in contemporary research to emphasize that this discussion is not merely an academic debate but may have significant implications for the psychotherapeutic landscape as a whole.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-135
Number of pages3
JournalPsychotherapy
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. American Psychological Association

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Group Therapy for Schizophrenia: Why Burlingame et al. (2020) Should Redo Their Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this