Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs

D.T. Meijer, J.N. Doornberg, I.N. Sierevelt, W.H. Mallee, C.N. Van Dijk, G.M. Kerkhoffs, S.A. Stufkens, E. Palmanovich, M. Van Sterkenburg, A. Engvall, E. Arroyo, M. Golovakha, E. Pereira, E.T. Josep Torrent, D. Haverkamp, I. Bojanic, M. Sousa, O.C. Aragon, A. Russo, C. CortesG. Pánics, J. Vide, L. Spanos, M.S. Carvalho, P. Maggi, Z. Thomas, H. Tanaka, M. Dinato, J. Fay, V. Kimtys, A.J. Correia Moreira, D. Hatziemmanuil, T.-C. Low, L.W. Van Der Plaat, A.D. Mora, I. Van Rensen, J. Del Vecchio, J. Ramos, J. Azevedo, C. Bustamante, A. Oliveira, H. Zaw, H. Kurup, T. Yli-Kyyny, E. Baca, H. Haapasalo, G. Bakhtamyan, P. Zbikowski, J. Kalb, P. Hemmingsson, M. Pinheiro, J. Davenport, P.L. Guidi, A.P. Simoes Da Silva, G. Martinho, P. Spennacchio, Y. Postnov, N. Dreiangel, N.G. Junior, I. Frangez, I. Bissell, Y. Khan, A. Toom, C.V. Bergen, H. Liszka, N. Moreno, B. Patczai, M. Van Den Bogaert, C. Marquis, A.K. Hussein, M. Andersen, L. Botezatu, F.F. Santos, C. Nery, S. Becirbegovc, C.L. Stoffel, P. Ferrao, I. Rakovac, N. Darabos, P. Sicchiero, K. Tengiz, L. Keiserman, E.J. Yeap, A.L. Rocha De Souza, S. Abdulsalam, A. Ramos, N. Martinelli, S. Verfaillie, C. Silva, S. Stufkens, V. Chouliaras, D. Da Costa, R. Freihaut, G. Bulstra, A. Burg, B. Rudge, A. Abdelwahab, A. Sirio, T. Watson, A.R. Gaspar, I. Sharp, M. Hossain, D. Van Deurzen, M. Van Den Bekerom, J.-J. Wiegerinck, I. Van Eekeren, R.-J. De Muinck Keizer

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review


© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Background Accurate assessment of articular involvement of the posterior malleolar fracture fragments in ankle fractures is essential, as this is the leading argument for internal fixation. The purpose of this study is to assess diagnostic accuracy of measurements on plain lateral radiographs. Methods Quantification of three-dimensional computed tomography (Q-3D-CT) was used as a reference standard for true articular involvement (mm2) of posterior malleolar fractures. One-hundred Orthopaedic Trauma surgeons were willing to review 31 trimalleolar ankle fractures to estimate size of posterior malleolus and answer: (1) what is the involved articular surface of the posterior malleolar fracture as a percentage of the tibial plafond? and (2) would you fix the posterior malleolus? Results The average posterior malleolar fragment involved 13.5% (SD 10.8) of the tibial plafond articular surface, as quantified using Q-3D-CT. The average involvement of articular surface of the posterior malleolar fragment, as estimated by 100 observers on plain radiographs was 24.4% (SD 10.0). The factor 1.8 overestimation of articular involvement was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of measurements on plain lateral radiographs was 22%. Interobserver agreement (ICC) was 0.61. Agreement on operative fixation, showed an ICC of 0.54 (Haraguchi type I = 0.76, Haraguchi type II = 0.40, Haraguchi type III = 0.25). Conclusions Diagnostic accuracy of measurements on plain lateral radiographs to assess articular involvement of posterior malleolar fractures is poor. There is a tendency to misjudge posteromedial involvement (Haraguchi type II).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2024-2029
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2015
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this