Abstract
Previous analyses have shown that cropland in China is intensifying, leading to an increase in crop production. However, these output measures leave the potential for further intensification largely unassessed. This study uses the harvested area gap (HAG), which expresses the amount of harvested area that can be gained if all existing cropland is harvested as frequently as possible, according to their potential limit for multi-cropping. Specifically, we calculate the HAG and changes in the HAG in China between 1981 and 2010. We further assess how climatic and land management factors affect these changes. We find that in China the HAG decreases between the 1980s and the 1990s, and subsequently increases between the 1990s and the 2000s, resulting in a small net increase for the entire study period. The initial decrease in the HAG is the result of an increase in the average multi-cropping index throughout the country, which is larger than the increase in the potential multi-cropping index as a result of the changed climatic factors. The subsequent increase in the HAG is the result of a decrease in average multi-cropping index throughout the country, in combination with a stagnant potential. Despite the overall increase in harvested area in China, many regions, e.g. Northeast and Lower Yangtze, are characterized by an increased HAG, indicating their potential for further increasing the multi-cropping index. The study demonstrates the application of the HAG as a method to identify areas where the harvested area can increase to increase crop production, which is currently underexplored in scientific literature.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 044006 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Environmental Research Letters |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 13 Mar 2018 |
Funding
The Agricultural Land System group at AGRIRS provided valuable support throughout the research. This work is financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501111, 41401116), by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution (IARRP-2017-27 and IARRP-2017-65) and by the China Scholarship Council (201503250030). PV acknowledges funding of the European Commission under ERC grant GLOLAND (no. 311819). LY acknowledges funding of the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM) led by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). The authors thank Prof. Jianguo Liu for his comments on drafting the paper. This work contributes to the Global Land Programme (www.glp.earth).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
CGIAR | |
International Food Policy Research Institute | |
Seventh Framework Programme | 311819 |
European Commission | |
European Research Council | |
National Natural Science Foundation of China | 41501111, 41401116 |
China Scholarship Council | 201503250030 |
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities | IARRP-2017-65, IARRP-2017-27 |