Healthcare students' ethical considerations of care robots in the Netherlands

Margo A.M. van Kemenade, Johan F. Hoorn, Elly A. Konijn

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Older adults are a rapidly growing group world-wide, requiring an increasing amount of healthcare. Technological innovations such as care robots may support the growing demand for care. However, hardly any studies address those who will most closely collaborate with care robots: the (trainee) healthcare professional. Methods: This study examined the moral considerations, perceptions of utility, and acceptance among trainee healthcare professionals toward different types of care robots in an experimental questionnaire design (N = 357). We also examined possible differences between participants' intermediate and higher educational levels. Results: The results show that potential maleficence of care robots dominated the discussion in both educational groups. Assisting robots were seen as potentially the most maleficent. Both groups deemed companion robots least maleficent and most acceptable, while monitoring robots were perceived as least useful. Results further show that the acceptance of robots in care was more strongly associated with the participants' moral considerations than with utility. Conclusions: Professional care education should include moral considerations and utility of robotics as emerging care technology. The healthcare and nursing students of today will collaborate with the robotic colleagues of tomorrow.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1712
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
Volume8
Issue number10
Early online date20 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Netherlands
robots
students
Robots
Students
robotics
acceptability
Robotics
Nursing
Design of experiments
emerging
education
Innovation
Education
Monitoring

Keywords

  • Ageing
  • Care education;moral perceptions
  • Healthcare robots
  • Healthcare/nursing professionals
  • Technology acceptance

Cite this

@article{733cd99c7b0642e3a2ff3c39d6a7a609,
title = "Healthcare students' ethical considerations of care robots in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Background: Older adults are a rapidly growing group world-wide, requiring an increasing amount of healthcare. Technological innovations such as care robots may support the growing demand for care. However, hardly any studies address those who will most closely collaborate with care robots: the (trainee) healthcare professional. Methods: This study examined the moral considerations, perceptions of utility, and acceptance among trainee healthcare professionals toward different types of care robots in an experimental questionnaire design (N = 357). We also examined possible differences between participants' intermediate and higher educational levels. Results: The results show that potential maleficence of care robots dominated the discussion in both educational groups. Assisting robots were seen as potentially the most maleficent. Both groups deemed companion robots least maleficent and most acceptable, while monitoring robots were perceived as least useful. Results further show that the acceptance of robots in care was more strongly associated with the participants' moral considerations than with utility. Conclusions: Professional care education should include moral considerations and utility of robotics as emerging care technology. The healthcare and nursing students of today will collaborate with the robotic colleagues of tomorrow.",
keywords = "Ageing, Care education;moral perceptions, Healthcare robots, Healthcare/nursing professionals, Technology acceptance",
author = "{van Kemenade}, {Margo A.M.} and Hoorn, {Johan F.} and Konijn, {Elly A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3390/app8101712",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Applied Sciences (Switzerland)",
issn = "2076-3417",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "10",

}

Healthcare students' ethical considerations of care robots in the Netherlands. / van Kemenade, Margo A.M.; Hoorn, Johan F.; Konijn, Elly A.

In: Applied Sciences (Switzerland), Vol. 8, No. 10, 1712, 10.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Healthcare students' ethical considerations of care robots in the Netherlands

AU - van Kemenade, Margo A.M.

AU - Hoorn, Johan F.

AU - Konijn, Elly A.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Background: Older adults are a rapidly growing group world-wide, requiring an increasing amount of healthcare. Technological innovations such as care robots may support the growing demand for care. However, hardly any studies address those who will most closely collaborate with care robots: the (trainee) healthcare professional. Methods: This study examined the moral considerations, perceptions of utility, and acceptance among trainee healthcare professionals toward different types of care robots in an experimental questionnaire design (N = 357). We also examined possible differences between participants' intermediate and higher educational levels. Results: The results show that potential maleficence of care robots dominated the discussion in both educational groups. Assisting robots were seen as potentially the most maleficent. Both groups deemed companion robots least maleficent and most acceptable, while monitoring robots were perceived as least useful. Results further show that the acceptance of robots in care was more strongly associated with the participants' moral considerations than with utility. Conclusions: Professional care education should include moral considerations and utility of robotics as emerging care technology. The healthcare and nursing students of today will collaborate with the robotic colleagues of tomorrow.

AB - Background: Older adults are a rapidly growing group world-wide, requiring an increasing amount of healthcare. Technological innovations such as care robots may support the growing demand for care. However, hardly any studies address those who will most closely collaborate with care robots: the (trainee) healthcare professional. Methods: This study examined the moral considerations, perceptions of utility, and acceptance among trainee healthcare professionals toward different types of care robots in an experimental questionnaire design (N = 357). We also examined possible differences between participants' intermediate and higher educational levels. Results: The results show that potential maleficence of care robots dominated the discussion in both educational groups. Assisting robots were seen as potentially the most maleficent. Both groups deemed companion robots least maleficent and most acceptable, while monitoring robots were perceived as least useful. Results further show that the acceptance of robots in care was more strongly associated with the participants' moral considerations than with utility. Conclusions: Professional care education should include moral considerations and utility of robotics as emerging care technology. The healthcare and nursing students of today will collaborate with the robotic colleagues of tomorrow.

KW - Ageing

KW - Care education;moral perceptions

KW - Healthcare robots

KW - Healthcare/nursing professionals

KW - Technology acceptance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053662406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053662406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/app8101712

DO - 10.3390/app8101712

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)

JF - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)

SN - 2076-3417

IS - 10

M1 - 1712

ER -