Heritage planning and spatial development in the Netherlands: changing policies and perspectives

J. Janssen, E. Luiten, J. Renes, J. Rouwendal

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In recent years, the separation of heritage conservation concerns and spatial planning concerns-a spectre of post-war modernism-is being criticised. Numerous commentators argue that heritage conservation needs to rethink its purpose and role if it is to maintain its place in the planning system specifically and urban and rural development more generally. This paper analyses the Belvedere Memorandum and its incentive programme (1999-2009) by which the Dutch government actively encouraged the integration of heritage conservation with spatial planning. It is a first attempt to identify the impact of Belvedere on Dutch heritage planning practises. We argue that Belvedere has contributed to a reorientation of heritage conservation. At the same time, however, heritage conservation now faces new challenges as a result of the fact that the government is reducing its involvement in spatial planning, of a turn-around in socio-economic and demographic development (from growth to shrinkage) and of a crisis in property development. We believe Belvedere can be called a success only if the heritage sector manages, under these changed circumstances, to actively respond to spatial challenges and forge links with social actors. © 2012 Taylor and Francis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Heritage Studies
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

heritage conservation
Netherlands
conservation
spatial planning
planning
Demographic Development
memorandum
planning practice
planning system
social actor
rural development
urban development
incentive
economic development
policy
The Netherlands
Heritage
Planning
Heritage Conservation
Conservation

Cite this

@article{5829d973607b4a40b95285efb277bd4f,
title = "Heritage planning and spatial development in the Netherlands: changing policies and perspectives",
abstract = "In recent years, the separation of heritage conservation concerns and spatial planning concerns-a spectre of post-war modernism-is being criticised. Numerous commentators argue that heritage conservation needs to rethink its purpose and role if it is to maintain its place in the planning system specifically and urban and rural development more generally. This paper analyses the Belvedere Memorandum and its incentive programme (1999-2009) by which the Dutch government actively encouraged the integration of heritage conservation with spatial planning. It is a first attempt to identify the impact of Belvedere on Dutch heritage planning practises. We argue that Belvedere has contributed to a reorientation of heritage conservation. At the same time, however, heritage conservation now faces new challenges as a result of the fact that the government is reducing its involvement in spatial planning, of a turn-around in socio-economic and demographic development (from growth to shrinkage) and of a crisis in property development. We believe Belvedere can be called a success only if the heritage sector manages, under these changed circumstances, to actively respond to spatial challenges and forge links with social actors. {\circledC} 2012 Taylor and Francis.",
author = "J. Janssen and E. Luiten and J. Renes and J. Rouwendal",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/13527258.2012.710852",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "International Journal of Heritage Studies",
issn = "1352-7258",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Heritage planning and spatial development in the Netherlands: changing policies and perspectives. / Janssen, J.; Luiten, E.; Renes, J.; Rouwendal, J.

In: International Journal of Heritage Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2014, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heritage planning and spatial development in the Netherlands: changing policies and perspectives

AU - Janssen, J.

AU - Luiten, E.

AU - Renes, J.

AU - Rouwendal, J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In recent years, the separation of heritage conservation concerns and spatial planning concerns-a spectre of post-war modernism-is being criticised. Numerous commentators argue that heritage conservation needs to rethink its purpose and role if it is to maintain its place in the planning system specifically and urban and rural development more generally. This paper analyses the Belvedere Memorandum and its incentive programme (1999-2009) by which the Dutch government actively encouraged the integration of heritage conservation with spatial planning. It is a first attempt to identify the impact of Belvedere on Dutch heritage planning practises. We argue that Belvedere has contributed to a reorientation of heritage conservation. At the same time, however, heritage conservation now faces new challenges as a result of the fact that the government is reducing its involvement in spatial planning, of a turn-around in socio-economic and demographic development (from growth to shrinkage) and of a crisis in property development. We believe Belvedere can be called a success only if the heritage sector manages, under these changed circumstances, to actively respond to spatial challenges and forge links with social actors. © 2012 Taylor and Francis.

AB - In recent years, the separation of heritage conservation concerns and spatial planning concerns-a spectre of post-war modernism-is being criticised. Numerous commentators argue that heritage conservation needs to rethink its purpose and role if it is to maintain its place in the planning system specifically and urban and rural development more generally. This paper analyses the Belvedere Memorandum and its incentive programme (1999-2009) by which the Dutch government actively encouraged the integration of heritage conservation with spatial planning. It is a first attempt to identify the impact of Belvedere on Dutch heritage planning practises. We argue that Belvedere has contributed to a reorientation of heritage conservation. At the same time, however, heritage conservation now faces new challenges as a result of the fact that the government is reducing its involvement in spatial planning, of a turn-around in socio-economic and demographic development (from growth to shrinkage) and of a crisis in property development. We believe Belvedere can be called a success only if the heritage sector manages, under these changed circumstances, to actively respond to spatial challenges and forge links with social actors. © 2012 Taylor and Francis.

U2 - 10.1080/13527258.2012.710852

DO - 10.1080/13527258.2012.710852

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - International Journal of Heritage Studies

JF - International Journal of Heritage Studies

SN - 1352-7258

IS - 1

ER -