Het concretiseren van beleidsdoelen in een verder weg gelegen toekomst; is dat nuttig? De WRR-studie ‘Doorgroei van arbeidsparticipatie’ uit 2000 als casus

Translated title of the contribution: Setting well quantified policy goals for the distant future: how useful can it be?: The Sentific Council's report on labour participation from 2000 as case study

Frank den Butter, C.A. Hazeu

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article discusses the usefulness of setting concrete future policy goals by taking the 2000 WRR (Scientific Council for Government Policy) report on labor market dynamics and further growth in labour participation as an example. With a so-called growth scenario over the period 2000-2020, that study looked at the obstacles that could arise if this further growth of the participation rate would materialize, and what policy measures could help to remove these obstacles. An important policy goal appeared to be fulfilled in 2020, namely to keep women and older men at work. The participation of these groups is currently even higher than anticipated in the growth scenario. Looking back at this study shows that it is useful to quantify possible future developments in the labour market in a scenario. The way of setting up the scenario analysis in the WRR report at the time can be regarded as a way in between a goal setting, normative approach and a positive approach. However, at the moment very different policy tasks require attention than in 2000.
Translated title of the contributionSetting well quantified policy goals for the distant future: how useful can it be?: The Sentific Council's report on labour participation from 2000 as case study
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)44-58
Number of pages15
JournalTPEdigitaal
Volume14
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Setting well quantified policy goals for the distant future: how useful can it be? The Sentific Council's report on labour participation from 2000 as case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this